| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,211 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
581 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2311 Posts |
My only complain is the 1883 looks cleaned. Otherwise, I like them all!! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
581 Posts |
I honestly believe that is a result of the picture itself. I purchased it from what I believed to be a reputable dealer at a show. I am nowhere near happy with the picture.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
I know how hard it is to take pictures and capture what the coin really looks like. That being said ....
Very nice looking FE. And a 1883 with cents is very hard to find in grades like you have. IMO ...two very nice coins
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1751 Posts |
Why did you opt to use a proof franklin rather than going straight business strikes across the board?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
581 Posts |
I liked the way it looked. it was better than the one that was in there. :-)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1080 Posts |
1883 with cents is a tough coin in better condition. Yours is nice!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
Nice finds!  I really like walker you got there!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
Just wondering, did the dealer mention anything about whizzing on the FE? I like the frosting on that franklin! Overall, not bad.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188001 Posts |
Very nice! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36688 Posts |
I agree with D0ubl3Eagle, your 1857 FE is nice but has the classic look of a whizzed coin. Your set looks nice, keep going on it!
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,211 |
|