| Author |
Replies: 63 / Views: 8,808 |
|
Valued Member
United States
332 Posts |
Edited by amnight 12/12/2013 10:54 pm
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'm on my lunch break, viewing this on my phone. I want to think about what I'm seeing here, and look at it on my monitor at home. It's....interesting.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
Please do post full obverse and reverse pictures so we can help you try and determine the VAM #. Kris
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
It looks like a normal olive in that position for the 16 olive (D2) reverse. All of the VAM dot listings, I believe ,the dots are in the field.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote:It looks like a normal olive in that position for the 16 olive (D2) reverse. All of the VAM dot listings, I believe ,the dots are in the field. There's one - V39 - with the dot in the middle of the wing and V3DO has a dot on the eagle's leg. Me, I'm forced to seriously consider that this is a previously-unlisted dot coin. The berry on the strongest of strikes does not resemble this, and the feature is too perfectly circular (and obviously on the die) to consider it anything postmint. It's also in the correct size range. This is most likely a known VAM with a previously-unrecorded dot. Nobody would look there for one. We need to establish an attribution if at all possible, and this one needs to appear at VAMworld.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
332 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
This all *might* be enough for me to come up with an attribution. Unfortunately, I'm in my "on" cycle at work - I've had all the sleep I'll get today in the time since my last post, and by Sunday morning 12 hours sleep in the last 72, with 36 of that on the clock. Study time is nonexistent until then. If somebody can come up with an attribution in the meantime, great; otherwise I'll see what I can figure out on Sunday.
If this is deemed a "dot," it's not a huge discovery but an interesting one, and will add to the body of knowledge. Leroy Van Allen will possibly need to see it. If you're not a member of VAMworld (and/or don't wish to join), I'll post the images over there for confirmation and add the new information to their database.
Can you possibly get one of those extreme closeups of the area around the eagle's right (viewer's left) foot, between it and the tailfeathers? I'd like to see what, if anything, there are for scribbles on this one.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
332 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
OK, I'm back and have all the time I need to play with this one. Let's see what we can do; it might be morning before I post here again. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
I looked for about a half hour and only made it about half way through the list if that far. It is a very interesting set of cracks that does not match up with the die crack guide.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: I looked for about a half hour and only made it about half way through the list if that far. It is a very interesting set of cracks that does not match up with the die crack guide.
The neck crack is pretty unique, and should be definitive. If I can find it somewhere. 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I spent about 20 minutes looking at D2 listings until I made the mistake of scrolling down to see what was remaining..  As 7TF mentioned, it needs to be in the die crack guide.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
Do you notice a slight clash at the neck? I see something strange in front of the nose and mouth (could be a clash but it is really mushy looking). I think you should post a good photo of the obverse and reverse and ask about it on VAMworld. You can refer to this link to show them the photos. Someone there will be able to id it if it is listed.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
332 Posts |
Thanks for the help 7TF. I will give it a try. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
743 Posts |
I would suggest uploading the pictures of the obv. cracks and the berry photo to VAMworld if you don't get any response by tomorrow night. It might take some time before the right person see's the post. The pictures you have uploaded on VAMworld will not work to make the attribution because they do not show the die cracks.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
OK, it took a little longer than I'd expected, but I've done all the looking I could think of, and come up (sort of) empty-handed. After going through my own archives (something north of a thousand individual images of 1921-P's under my own camera lens) as well as VAMworld's collection (plus a few other places), I've not found that neck crack which is what I was keying on because if its' uniqueness. That means very little in the grand scheme of things, simply because of the relative lack of information. 1921 has a huge number of varieties, and only a very small number of them include enough information to be relevant to this search. One ongoing result is, every time I do this I come up with a dozen-plus different 1921 VAMs which really ought to be considered for consolidation into another. There's just too much information created by too many different people - somebody, someday, has to try to get a personal handle on all of this in the same place. I feel for that person, when they do. I have one takeaway which I consider somewhat important from this whole process: I found at least two other varieties which have the same "dot" inside various berries. Now, these are popularly considered to be deliberate hardness tests, and I see no reason to doubt that conclusion. It seems intuitive that hiding them inside a berry is a good idea if you really don't want to call attention to them. There are plenty of examples of dots in prominent places, though - is this the product of multiple different testers with differing opinions about the quality of their work? If this one is going to go up on VAMworld - don't necessarily expect someone to have an immediate answer, for the reasons I've enumerated above - the points to highlight are the obverse cracks. The ones through the neck and the last two left stars + "E" are rather unique in shape, and will be what makes the coin stand out from other 1921's. The combination of those specific two cracks - remember, die cracks are like fingerprints - should be sufficient to differentiate this coin from any other 1921-P. So, to that extent, I somewhat disagree with 7TF's opinion that full-face images are exactly imperative. If you're truly obsessed as a VAMmer, the cracks alone are enough. If you can find someone who's seen them before.
|
| |
Replies: 63 / Views: 8,808 |