| Author |
 Replies: 16 / Views: 3,335 |
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
I've looked a good amount and can't seem to figure out what variety this is, since most from this date are bust left. Can someone please lend a hand? Also a ballpark valuation would help too, if possible. Thanks!   |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16679 Posts |
Decent looking grade. Looks problem free. Not sure of Miller # right off the bat but I'm going with F12-15.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
397 Posts |
Edited by OLCoins
03/24/2014 10:08 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Think a little earlier. Specifically, 1785-- Miller 3.5-B.
Edited by philadelphian
03/24/2014 11:04 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
Yeah, there is no way that's a 1787. I think p nailed it as M 3.5-B
Did NGC call it a 1787?
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
philadelphian, ah I see what you are saying now. But I actually like Miller 3.5 B better. I think the hair over the forehead is a better fit, the thickness of the leaves of the headband, and the neck is a little chunkier like in mine....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
Yeah, I changed my post in the end.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1211 Posts |
Nice R5 CT. I would go with F on grade.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
Great coin Sunnyd23!
Congrats!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
vermont, yep 1787 was put on label. But I suspect that is because 1787 is just what I put down as the date when I submitted it. And I was going off what the previous owner had on the flip lol We are finally breaking the cycle of telling this poor coin he is a 1787 when he is a 1785
philadelph, thanks for the push in the right direction
I will unveil grade tonight.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3253 Posts |
So NGC didn't think it was their job to tell you the actual date of the coin you sent in? What if you said it was a New Jersey copper? Or a St Gaudens double eagle? Would have been gratifying to know I was better at attributing than NGC, but I guess they just didn't bother.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
397 Posts |
phila, yah it just makes you scratch your head doesn't it?
NGC gave this a G 6
Thanks for looking everybody!
Edited by OLCoins
03/25/2014 9:26 pm
|
|
Moderator
United States
16679 Posts |
The problem with TPG's, is they don't know how to grade Colonial copper. Until they get experts in there that grade properly, this will continue. They grade these just like Large Cents and you can't do that. Nice coin though :-) swcoin.ecrater.com
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 3,335 |
Posted 03/24/2014 9:28 pm
