| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 10,726 |
|
|
New Member
United States
6 Posts |
These were acquired from a dealer, sold as "aluminum magnesium" type. We are of the impression these are replicas, although at first glance they looked different than other fakes we have seen. Might an expert - gumer - be interested in commenting? Thank you.  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
602 Posts |
I never even knew such coins existed! Wow...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1757 Posts |
See here: http://www.ebay.com/itm/1943-RARE-L...em2ecd0d08cdCan't recall seeing these before ... there is a dealer in the central U.S. ... who is big on WWII Jewish items ... these do not appear as Al/Mg issues and certainly the weight criteria on these to these pieces may differ as the appear as cast or of a different metal alloy. Compare the SURFACES to the slab piece. However - it may be the Al or Mg may have varied in different examples or Mg being a metal that corrodes EASILY ... some of these coins MAY look like casts which may only be Mg corrosion in these Al/Mg alloy pieces. Weigh them ... but being what they are ... who can be sure of the standard? But Al and Mg are LIGHT and Pb is heavy ... John Lorenzo United States
Edited by colonialjohn 04/19/2014 6:09 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1666 Posts |
These look pretty good. The roughness supports them being mid century magnesium coins, this is what you would expect magnesium to look like after 60+ years. I'm also not seeing some of the markers of later aluminum copies here.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
598 Posts |
|
|
New Member
 United States
6 Posts |
Thank you for all the input. IBGolden, might you please message the expert on that link for me? I am not able to do so due to my new status of the forum. Much respect.
|
|
Valued Member
Poland
68 Posts |
Those coins are modern fakes.
|
|
Valued Member
Poland
68 Posts |
*** Edited by Staff - Removed dead images. ***
|
|
Pillar of the Community
France
1591 Posts |
Gumer : can you post a genuine one ? :D
|
|
Valued Member
Poland
68 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Norway
89 Posts |
"10 Mark 1943": Is there such a thing as a correct weight and exact diameter and thickness, which may serve as an indication as to its authenticity? Does 10.7 g and Ø 27mm make sense?
Edited by diatonix 08/20/2014 06:44 am
|
|
Valued Member
Poland
68 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Austria
566 Posts |
These must be the most faked jewish coins out there. I have been seeing these for years and mostly 1 of 100 is good.
|
|
Valued Member
Poland
68 Posts |
Diatonix. The correct weight for 5 mark is around 1,03 grams. The correct weight for 10 mark minted in magnesium is around 1,7 grams The correct weight for 10 mark minted in aluminium is around 3,5 grams The correct weight for 20 mark minted in aluminium is around 6,8 grams
The weight depends on the thickness of a coin, but I know counterfeits which have exactly the same weight as genuine coins. Please, paste a photo of your coin, but I'm almost 100% sure that this is a fake coin. Compare your coin with photos from my website.
|
|
Valued Member
Poland
68 Posts |
Coinworldtv.
Demand creates supply :)
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 10,726 |
|