The shape of the "8" in the date is spot on. On the other hand, the "1" in both the date and the "10" is notably undersized, and the "4" looks as if it was made up from what was originally a "1". However, San Luis Potosi mint's output in this period was of uneven quality, with expedients in production galore. For example, they were supposedly at this time the only branch mint that was actually [i]casting['i] flans owing to a lack of proper machinery to roll the material and then punch them out.
The eagle's claw where it's grasping the snake is the highest point on that side of the coin, and typically is a focal point for showing flattening first, and the most as wear accumulates. That said, the whole body of the eagle looks excessively worn relative to the rest of the coin. But this could be the result of just a terrible strike to begin with. This coin is a hard call overall.
There's a documented contemporary counterfeit of the 1843 Pi that's correct in weight, but is debased nonetheless. So determining the specific gravity of your specimen would be enlightening.
Colligo ergo sum
Edited by Lucky Cuss
05/10/2014 11:16 am