| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,314 |
|
|
New Member
United States
31 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
I would guess 38, because the middle section of that digit appears to be near middle of the bottom loop. If it was a 5, I think it would be more full width.
EDIT - Also, the bottom loop of the 5 that year was less curved
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
1938. The bottom of a five is less curved than what's shown on this coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2824 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1431 Posts |
Even more telling is the number 8, which is much wider on a 1958.
This is unquestionably a 1938-D
Edited by Kefiroth 05/09/2014 11:45 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
860 Posts |
The overall condition is more like what you would expect with a 1938 than a 1958.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
330 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
15445 Posts |
 Well circulated, and damaged, 1938-D Jefferson. David
|
|
Valued Member
United States
115 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
716 Posts |
The upper loop of the 8 in 1938 is much smaller than the lower loop. The upper and lower loops of the 8 are the same size in 1948, 1958, 1968, etc. By the way I collect all 1938s because of this unique characteristics. Yours is 1938d.
Edited by Yinzi50 10/25/2014 01:39 am
|
|
Valued Member
United States
433 Posts |
i would have to say 38-D nice find
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3486 Posts |
About the 8: my thought exactly. I am in agreement with Kefiroth.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,314 |
|