| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,288 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
498 Posts |
Maybe cleaned but $63.00 with shipping can't get hurt to bad   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
VF Details, I'd pass on this one..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
I'd say VF-30 Details. I'd pass.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Nice strike, looks cleaned, VF-35
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Korea, Republic Of
1881 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7197 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
170 Posts |
Price really jumps at XF 40 but why as the mintage is not like a 1921 Peace or Mercury at 1.94 million.. is it because it's the only 1928 for the series?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7197 Posts |
Price for higher grade early walkers is due to the availability of the grade. you can find worn examples in most every date but high grades are difficult to find.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36845 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Vf-30, and I agree with your suspicion that it has been cleaned.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6396 Posts |
A traditional standard for VF is a complete outline for the breastplate but that is usually relaxed for Walkers dated before 1934. I'd agree with VF-30 details, with cleaning likely based on the overly-bright look. I can't tell from your photos whether hairlines from abrasive cleaning are present. For comparison, here is my 1920-S Walker which at one time was graded EF-40 by PCI. It is now in an NGC holder, graded VF-35.   |
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,288 |
|
Posted 05/24/2014 1:17 pm
