| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,342 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1531 Posts |
No idea what it would grade, but I'll give it a shot.  VF35 |
|
Valued Member
United States
415 Posts |
xf details. harshly/improperly cleaned
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5417 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
Closed 3 Variety (better date) with XF40 Details - Surface Damage/Contamination.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Definitely EF-45 as there is too much luster to be called anything else. The environmental damage on the reverse will probably cause it to get a details grade and it has probably been cleaned at some point. Me still likes though!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3229 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7617 Posts |
EF details - environmental damage
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
 with BH1964 EF40 details cleaned. "Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440 |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
301 Posts |
OK, answer is AU53, closed 3 variety, problem free!! not a mention of any issues or damages!! I had hoped for higher......
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4849 Posts |
I have to admit, AU53 is higher than I would have gone. Are these scans or pictures? If scans, I can understand the lower grades, because scans really inhibit luster and can make the surfaces look "off". It must have more luster and more original surfaces than what is shown here....and likely a weak strike.
I would have guessed 45 details, cleaned from the scan/pics shown.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
301 Posts |
These are scans. I agree that the scans make them look dull. I need to invest in a nice camera
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,342 |
|
Posted 06/05/2014 11:33 pm
