| Author |
 Replies: 20 / Views: 2,359 |
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
Edited by 6thCents
09/01/2014 01:28 am
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Israel
2420 Posts |
Details looks MS. Can't say if surfaces are original or AT.
|
|
New Member
 United States
22 Posts |
Thanks Supgog, I guess one way to find out is to send it in. I have 8 credits with pcgs and this one is a candidate to be sent in.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4692 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
I don't think I would send it in,the eye appeal just isn't there..IMHO. John1  |
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
I don't think I did the coin justice with my quick pictures I am going to post the sellers pic to show how it looks at an angle(second image). I bought it really for it's eye appeal, to me. I have enough 1909s for a couple of sets, lol.   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Interesting "feature" on the neck.
Die scratch?
Interested in seeing if that's a diagnostic for a Snow variety.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
171 Posts |
Color looks suspect to me. Don't quote me but I believe I have read somewhere to "watch out" for this seller.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2368 Posts |
Questionable color. I've heard some bad things about the seller as well.
|
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
Again the thought did run through my mind, why wouldn't they have slabbed it as a large organization with the budget and the resources to get it done. One answer, I guess, is that it would get a details only grade?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
688 Posts |
That seller is known for having pictures of coins that are not a true representation of the actual coin itself. To me, it looks like an AU-details coin.
I have never bought from this seller, but from my understanding they are generally very good about accepting returns within the proper timeframe
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Artificially toned, AU details.
|
|
New Member
United States
22 Posts |
so far the consensus is that it's AU and artificially toned, Thanks for all the input! About natural toning, can it be seen from all angles or when you turn it a certain angle? i.e. is it in the core metal or the lamination on the surface that's getting the tone? I'll be going to my first show in maybe 15 years. speaking of, I pulled out a UK mint set from 1987 and I think I found an error in a proof set. I'm starting a thread in the world error section but I'll include one pic as a tease...  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36883 Posts |
The coin looks MS, I don't see any wear in any of the photos. As the others have said, the color is questionable. Call this one UNC details. Not worth slabbing.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
I've bought stuff from that seller before. I agree with the other comment (s) regarding the seller. I'm not sure how deceptive their photos are, but they are really good at taking them and showing the coin the the best "light." They could put up higher resolutions photos, or multiple photos of each coin with different, more revealing, less reflective lighting. They clearly have skilled photographers..
They recently changed their policy that they will now no longer offer a grade for raw coins. Probably too many negatives/ returns. They say that you need a "good knowledge of the rare coin business" before you bid. I'm guessing that anyone with a really "good knowledge" would not be buying raw coins at top dollar from them They also say they sell slabbed coins; so yes, I feel they have made a conscious decision to not slab the raw coins they sell. Some of their raw coins go for $500+
If this were a non-details, MS-63+ and it were slabbed, it would go for a lot more $$ than what was paid, and would make up the money for them to have it slabbed.
and a fla-fla-flu-hi to you all...
|
| |
Replies: 20 / Views: 2,359 |
Posted 09/01/2014 06:04 am
