Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsRoyal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Tuscany 1807 Francescone - Need Your Comments

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 2,055Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 11/09/2014  02:13 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I buy this coin by US$142 in ebay recently. Is it a good buy in this condition for a Napoleonic crown size coin? But there are two features that I don't understand and need your comments.

First, what is the cause of the presence of numerous tiny silver remnant on the observe side? The background field on the reverse size is normal.

Second, the coin is relatively thin in comparing with an average crown, yet the striking of the coin is not as shallow as expected (see the strong portraits on the coin). Will it be produced by modern technique?

I am looking forward to seeing your comments.

The coin is 27.12 grams (std. 27.50g), 41.5-41.8 mm measured.
Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 11/09/2014  03:36 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I can see why you asked. Looks like it may have been cast! those "bubbles all over the obverse look very much like the bubbles you see when sand casting has been used. Have you tried a magnet on it?

Edit: Oops another possibility: Can you you post a clearer photo of the edge. It looks to me like there is a join seam running down the middle of the edge. If that is the case then you likely have a lead filled electrotype. As annoying as that might be I have actually been looking for electrotypes: but not at that Price!!
Edited by austrokiwi
11/09/2014 03:47 am
Pillar of the Community
Medieval's Avatar
3772 Posts
 Posted 11/09/2014  04:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Medieval to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Agree with 'austrokivi' that the tiny bubbles are suspicious. To make a conclusive judgement by the pictures alone is difficult though, my recommendation would be to show it to a knowledgeable dealer - in hand and with a loupe it's easier to make a proper judgement.
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 11/09/2014  08:40 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coin is non-magnetic to N52 Neodymium but it slides down to my designated magnet slide a bit faster than it should be (according to my experience). That means I would say the silver content is a bit lower than usual. I would do a S.G. test on it when I have time.

I am sure these are tiny lumps of silver rather than bubbles on the surface, they are in irregular shape, protruding and happened on one side only.

I post the pictures of the complete rim here.
Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments

Tuscany-1807-Francescone---Need-Your-Comments
Pillar of the Community
coinworldtv's Avatar
Austria
566 Posts
 Posted 11/09/2014  09:29 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinworldtv to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Henry,

i think, that this coin might have been struck with a rusty obverse die.

I do not think, that the coin is a fargery as far as I can see from the photographs.
Pillar of the Community
austrokiwi's Avatar
2087 Posts
 Posted 11/09/2014  10:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add austrokiwi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for posting the better edge pictures. there does appear to be a seam line to my eyes but I could be seeing things. A rusty die intrigues me. Why in the world would they use a rusty die unless its a later restrike? I know there was something funny going on in Florence and Lucca at that time. Many of the coins were actually struck some time around 1810-1815 rather than the dates actually recorded on them. I have tried to ferret out the story but so far have not been successful
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 11/10/2014  9:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If you check on the Heritage website you can find several examples of this identical coin. Several appear with very similar surface textures. There also appear to be multiple die pairs known as well.

That said I look at the pictures of the ebay coin and feel something is not quite right - color - cleaning?

Before I checked the Heritage site I was very sure the coin would be a cast copy made from transfer dies - now I am much less certain but uneasy about authenticity.

Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 12/24/2014  10:54 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Compare the coin with the pictures on Heritage website, I tends to agree the coin was produced from a rust die. It is still genuine for me. I have done the S.G. of this coin, it is 10.273 (=88.9% Ag).

Thank you all of you.
Valued Member
UncleLuc's Avatar
Canada
270 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2014  01:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add UncleLuc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There are a few things that strike me as odd...
1. The mint reported an original lighter weight...not by much but still odd..
2. Diameter of your coin seems to be too large when compared to 43mm reporting.
3. Biggest issue for me...look at the background pattern behind the shield...(looks like 2 capital C's touching) that part of the design should not cross over the shield at any time as it is the background of the coin. It looks more like they are randomly placed to fit the design with the mistake being made where the pattern crosses over the bottom right triangle of the shield....from what I know about how these coins were struck it just seems weird in my opinion...any thoughts?
Pillar of the Community
wonghinghi's Avatar
Hong Kong
1270 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2014  08:09 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add wonghinghi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
UncleLuc, you said,


Quote:
2. Diameter of your coin seems to be too large when compared to 43mm reporting.


But my coin is 41.5-41.8 mm...
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2014  09:22 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The occluded gas bubble hypothesis is supported by a microscopic surface texture that is identical to the surrounding field. Do microscopic die flow lines continue across the air bubbles without interruption? This supports the idea that the die face was intact and undisturbed when the coin was struck.

Occluded gas bubbles are restricted to solid-alloy coins and should be distinguished from plating blisters that form in copper-plated zinc cents. Blistered plating occurs when there is a poor bond between the copper plating and the zinc core. Heat generated by the strike causes gas expansion beneath the plating, pushing it up.

Mike Diamond from Coin World explaining air bubbles on an early 20thC Lincoln Cent.

Like I said you do display challenging coins and you seem savy enough to avoid a Chinese Die Transfer and an early cast? We hope. LOL. Cast - with this sharp lettering? My guess its surface contamination followed by occluded gas bubbles. Seen this before but not often as on one Evasion Copper sold to me by the late Tom Madigan. Severe occluded surface.Incredible piece.

Check the flow lines OVER the air bubbles. Report.

KOOL coin.



JPL


Valued Member
UncleLuc's Avatar
Canada
270 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2014  10:08 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add UncleLuc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Correction too small*... slipped my eye.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 12/30/2014  11:43 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coin does appear on my list of known numismatic forgeries. The notation indicates there are centrifugal casting. I do not have a picture associated with the forgery so I can only caution that numismatic copies of the date do in fact exist but that this one "looks" good from the pictures.

The caution John provided about looking for continuous flow lines across ALL die features including rust is right on. It is an older technique that absolutely applies to most metal dies. When a feature is part of a die it erodes along with the die surface. On a metal die this erosion is rather slow. The lines should pass over or through such features uninterrupted on a die that has been used.

Two cautionary notes - first, the first strikes made after a rusted die is mounted for the first time will lack ALL flow lines so be aware of that. Second on a centrifugal (injection mold) the mold itself is made of a hard rubberlike material in most cases - the erosion lines will develop quickly because the surface is much softer than die steel - but the flow is usually NOT RADIAL at all.

Get to know what genuine and particularly what counterfeit erosion lines look like under a binocular microscope by studying known forgeries of all types and it will be VERY valuable as a diagnostic tool even if you have never seen an original of any particular coin. Once you know erosion lines are from centrifugal casting and not from radial flow of a strike - you will never fall for another coin made in that way.
  Previous TopicReplies: 12 / Views: 2,055Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Forums