| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,570 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
112 Posts |
Whether or not this is a "Near" date or "Normal" date will weigh heavily on the relative rarity of this Morgan. I'm purposely not showing the whole date in order not to sway anyone's judgement. So, what say you? Near or Normal? It seems to fall right on the border.......  (I'll reveal the whole date after a few responses).  Thanks, Rick 
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Unfortunately, that varies by issue. Need to know the date.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2254 Posts |
I know nothing about the subject at hand, but that's a pretty good close up you have there.. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
112 Posts |
Thanks!.... scanners can do a pretty good job! Dave, Here's another picture of a different coin.... same date, same mint. There are only near and normal dates for this mintage. This one looks "nearer" to me. Does this help any? (if it doesn't, I'll reveal the date and mint). Thanks! Rick 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
To me, the original coin is the "normal" date, and the bottom coin is the near date. It seems fairly clear.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
112 Posts |
Okay.... Here's the bottom line. The coin in question is a 1897-P, pitted reverse. Could be either a VAM 6A-Pitted Reverse with a Near Date: http://www.vamworld.com/1897-P+VAM-6Aor, a VAM 1A-Pitted Reverse with a Normal Date: http://www.vamworld.com/1897-P+VAM-1A. They are identical except for the date placement, but the difference is that the VAM 1A has never been found...  Here's a pic of the two coin dates together. They are both 1897-Ps. The one labled "NEAR DATE" does not have a pitted reverse. The one labled "NORMAL DATE" is the coin in question.  Here's the obverse of the pitted reverse coin:  Here's the reverse:  And here's a closeup of the pitting:  So, what do you think? Long lost 1897-P VAM 1A  , or common everyday VAM 6A  ? You can burst my bubble if you want, I won't mind.... this is actually a lot of fun!  Thanks, Rick
Edited by Bottleguy 09/03/2007 10:38 pm
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Um, in my opinion,  The bottom serif of the 1 on your coin does not reach the second denticle from the neck point, as the Near Date example shows. I understand completely now, why you chose to present it in this fashion.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
112 Posts |
Thanks Dave!  is what I figured.  Apparently there were two "near date" dies used for the 1897-P........ and I've got one of each!  Thanks again, Rick
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
When you consider that there were 70 dies produced for the 1897-P, each having the date stamped into it individually, it's a wonder there aren't more variations.
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 1,570 |
|