| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,942 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
946 Posts |
My father gave me this SEGS 1945 MS67 fB. He told me to sell it if I want,If I do sell it I would want it in a PCGS holder of course. I know it will not come back as a 67...im hoping a 65+ with FB designation. What do you guys think? 
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
457 Posts |
Do you have a picture of the reverse? That is the only way we can tell if your coin has the FB designation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
946 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
946 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
946 Posts |
Waiting for photobucket to load...Its a little slow today.. Ive been checking the PCGS website and man this coin is sooo close.. I feel it will depend on how pcgs is feeling that day. I've also heard that since it is so rare they do give it to the ones that make it. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
946 Posts |
Really hoping so...this is a flip of the coin (pun intended) ...really really nice coin. Just need to get it into a PCGS holder. Thanks everyone for the help. I will be going to work now and ill be checking in throughout the day. Hopefully someone can chime in some more.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1566 Posts |
I have no problem with MS-65 but in my opinion the middle bands are not fully split.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
946 Posts |
That it is very close.From one angle the line is fully separated. Then you look at it from the other side and it gas a little notch on the facet. Uhh ever so close. I checked some PCGS 1945s with FBs and some looked worse then this.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4132 Posts |
I don't think it should be full bands, but it's better struck than 99% of 1945 dimes and should carry some premium regardless.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6383 Posts |
Used to be you could send in an SEGS-holdered coin to PCGS and specify the minimum crossover grade you would accept; if it didn't make the grade they keep your money and return the coin in the original holder. I would call them and get an update on their current policy. I would NOT crack this coin out for resubmission since you would lose the "official" FB grade with no guarantee that PCGS would then assign FB when they grade it. I doubt very much they will award FB unless they are confident the coin fully meets their criteria.
You might still get a good price for it in the SEGS holder if your intention is to sell.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
I am with Jaobler on this; send it in as a minimum crossover, if it does not merit the grade they will send it back as is. I would not shoot for the moon stating a minimum MS67. Others have mentioned MS65 (or lower), that would probably be pretty safe.
I don't think that PCGS would give it the FB though...oh so close! I have been wrong before. Keep us informed regardless.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1704 Posts |
I have one that is very similar to yours but raw. I was told by more than one person that because of the extreme rarity of 1945 split bands dimes PCGS is sometimes a bit lenient if it is "close enough." It resides comfortably in a blue Capital Plastics 1934 - 45 Mercury dime holder and I have no intention of sending it to PCGS.   
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
946 Posts |
Gyrene..I have heard that as well..so I'm hoping that's how they are feeling when I send it in...probably sometime this week if I can get out of work early enough
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'd risk the grading fee on it, regardless of grade. It's this >< close.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
584 Posts |
I say go for it, I would also keep it in the holder. To much to lose cracking it out.. Best of luck.
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,942 |