| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,900 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
346 Posts |
1929, D is almost all filled in. Date seems normal, probably just wear 1934, 4 in date is worn, but small Cud (?) next to it. (dot)  34 rev. D is all filled in
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
bonham
Your pics are way too small !
the coins both look like ordinary coins to me .
Metalman
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
346 Posts |
Best I can do at 600 dpi scan. If you know how I can tweak an HP 3400C scanjet to do 1200 plus please let me know and I will. Seems odd, if someone sends in a pic. of a 1929 or 1934 lincoln and the "D" looks like a bump on a log it is at least something. I guess dimes are out of the pecking order. No big deal either way. Just asking so as to learn. Silver is up this week, so it's worth a buck. I went through a hundred or so mercs so I just decided to check em before throwing them in the bullion pile.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1984 Posts |
I am sympathetic to your huffiness, I am not a connoisseur of Lincolns and don't get too picky about them myself.
Your dimes look as if they are suffering from normal wear and tear. The mint marks get filled in and edges wear unevenly.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
346 Posts |
Thank You
I appreciate the reply. That makes sense as those mint marks are pretty high originally. and these coins are wel worn. If they were in great shape and the mark was still filled, would it be the same scenario as if it were another coin I.E.: cent or nickel etc. Those I have learned are not a big deal. Will have to look up what that phenom is called technically.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
bonham I have collected Mercury dimes for better than 25 years ! all it takes to make a filled mint mark is the chipping away of the center post which creates the definition of the letter . there are a number of RPM's for the merc's but after a certian amount of wear and with small pics they are very hard to see. Metalman PS. there are few circulated merc's that rise above the bullion level (42/1) for the varieties ,, If you want to collect for value and Beauty concentrate on the ones that display FSB chacteristics.  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
914 Posts |
> I guess dimes are out of the pecking order. Not true at all! We just can't tell from your pics. I have four RPM Mercury dimes and love the entire Mercury series.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Both Dimes were harshly cleaned .
A filled mintmark is common. Nothing special about that.
The harsh cleaning causes both pieces to be worth no more than melt value.
Thanks, Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2764 Posts |
For the Mercury dimes to qualify as FSB, all three bands on the Rev. have to be full (visibly separated) right?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I don't see what you are referring to as a Cud, a Cud would be close to the rim of the coin (atleast all of them I have ever seen) if it is a dot near the date I don't know what that could be but I can't see it in the pictures
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
346 Posts |
Thank's all for your thoughts if they were in better shape it might be worthwhile to pursue. I myself only keep the FSB ones. Only have a few and they are later dates 40's. Never thought much about errors on them (mercs.) so I was curious. It's hard to post error coins unless you have a real clear closeup. If metalman reads this, maybe he would not mind telling me how he got those 2 merc. pics. done. I did the best I could with what I have. I have read some posts on the camera etc. forum. Too much stuff. All these lenses and filters etc. If it is just a matter of a better, higher res. scanner, then I can go there. You have to have some decent equipt. if you want to find out ? I gave up on the camera aspect for closeups.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Bonham3 - Mild correction, and I say this as nicely as I can...you did the best you could with your knowledge of what you have. You should probably read into the help menus for your scanner and your editing software. A 600DPI scanner is perfectly capable of doing what Metalman posted and more.
If, however, you want nice images of coins...you'll need to switch over to a digital camera, copy stand, and a couple of desk lamps.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
Quote: I have read some posts on the camera etc. forum. Too much stuff. All these lenses and filters etc. I use a camera that I got off of ebay for (I think) 25 bucks a few years ago. I do not use any special lense I just use the macro setting built into the camera and I can get close enough to show what I am talking about to get opinions. I admit it is not as good as some but they get the job done. My camera is 3.2MP and I have to downsize the images to get them to fit on the forum a pretty good bit and they still are able to be maximized to show the detail I am trying to show pretty well, so you don't need an expensive camera at all just a little knowledge of the camera that you do get and some knowledge of the software to shrink the image to fit on the forum
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
Got to go along with Bryan1315. I have several digital cameras and the cheapest one is the best. I got 3 of them new at a flea market. DHX brand, whatever that is. My son got one, his wife and me. They are great and only cost $20 new. No need for light stands, just learn to hold still and use that thing outside called the Sun As to Mercury dimes. Yes those just look worn. One dealer I know at flea markets sell such for $1 each and if you buy a lot of them, he reduces his prices. He has no idea of their value and cares less. I have many valuable ones from him such as a 42D/41, 26S, etc. As to the Mint marks, normal. Just always compare the sizes. Many more small and large dates are appearing with the small dates worth a little more. Until someone figures out how many of each are out there, watch out for the small Mint Marks such as the famous 45 Micro S. The next thing to watch out for is Mercury dimes are famous for rotated reverses. Not sure if the obverse or reverse is rotated. Different opinions there. I've found some with as much as almost 170 degrees rotated. Most are rotated to the right at the top reverse. About 30% or more of all my Merc's are rotated. I have well over 3,000 of them. Presently trying to make a display showing Merc Rotations from left to middle to right in order of various degrees. I've had fun with dealers noting this and getting a reduced price because of it. I usually just say, oh, no the reverse is rotated and I wanted to buy this. Most dealers, for some reason, never noticed this. I feel someday that will be listed in the Red Book starting a stampede on Merc Dimes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7123 Posts |
Hi Bonham
I will always be interested in your Merc's ! as well as Lincoln cents,Jeffersons ,Roosevelts and world coin errors .
These pics were taken with my old digital camera, fugifilm finepix A-205 it is a 2 mega pixel with a simple macro setting my lighting was natural light (outside under my front porch).They were processed in a simple processor that came with the camera ,cropped to remove unwanted back ground and reduced in file size somewhat to speed down load time.
I still have to re photograph this particular coin with my new one which should produce much better quality pictures .
Silent !
FSB references the center bands on the mercury series.
The bands to be full must be completely seperated with rounded tops ,,if they display any flat spots then to the purist like myself they would be close but not FSB.
Metalman
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
346 Posts |
Makes sense Shooting outside. I have a 4 mp camera with the macro settng etc. that should do it. It also came with a nice mini tripod. Back to work. Thank's for all the help. When I get it right i'll post one of my 40's fsb mercs. Belive me, I'm a nut about axis rotation coins also. I check all. Have many canadians (grey area huh :)Well, I'm of french descent (france) so it's O.K. But I ck. those also. Guess any after 1908 are medal so easy to spot an error.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,900 |
|