Yes much better image Phillip.
I wish I could do the same.. gotta learn.
First I should correct an error stated. The King portrait is unique on this 1927 and the 1934-35 Florins.
I still think looks a little on the weak side when looking at the base area of the bust.
This can happen and only today I received a cast slab item containing UNC pre-decimals with a Half Penny that shows heavy on one side and weak or die clash rendition on the other.
ebay ref #
110167555005I look at image and see inconsistent toning around legend and devices. Like as if those areas haven't been able to be scrubbed 'clean'[sadly of design features sometimes!].
Given the direct history you can draw upon Phillip, perhaps that toning characteristic is due to an inconsistent environmental barrier that has 'protected' from the natural oxidisation process. An oil film would do so.
I avoid touching silver because my skin type seems to send jewelry black very quicky.
Without doubt this is a lovely example at aUNC or possibly better in reality.
How many full steps can be seen with lens in the centre of the house?
My opinion can be a bit jaded from dealing on
ebay.
I didn't want to offend in that posting by suggesting a $$$ value, but if this was up on
ebay for safety I'd consider a bid 50 - 80% of CV at EF grade... but I'm on lookout for a Gem UNC.
Sorry mate. I find it crass to put $$$ value on prized items.
Whats room consensus on the issue of cleaning to 'blast white' degree and re-toning here?