| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,243 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
974 Posts |
Thoughts on grade?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4944 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11951 Posts |
Great job on the picture  When coins are enlarged to this size, it is easier to see the hits the coins have. Because of that .. I think the coin looks MS63 But because I know that, I think in hand .. it might be a MS64. If you can see those hits on cheek .. in hand I would still be at MS63
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Yup 63 with the jaw ding and chatter in the fields
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18665 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
I'm afraid a TPG would call it AU58 due to the nature of the marks on the cheek, but my own opinion agrees with the above.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1353 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1874 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
Without the gash on the cheek I would go MS64, but I am in the MS63 camp
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36745 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3540 Posts |
Like this as a strong 64, shot at 65. Superb strike on the obverse and reverse. If luster in hand is better than what the photo is teasing us with, I am at 65.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
134 Posts |
I'm probably a high 63 but the wear on the hat and the hits on the cheek are a bit worrying.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
974 Posts |
Edited by Nelrak 04/03/2015 2:33 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 2,243 |
|