| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,180 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
214 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2600 Posts |
Lincolns head strike on the reverse seems to be incised which means it was struck against a positive, not a neg. Does not that mean either a die clash of worst case a garage job. Jim
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I agree this is definately not a double struck coin all one can hope for is thats its a clashed die that may have clashed a couple times without a planchet in between the dies. The reason I say all you can hope for is because the same looking effect will come from a vice or a hammer hitting two coins together, but the design will be incuse on the coin and not raised if this happened and since I am no lincoln expert I will leave that part to the ones that do specialize in these things
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
214 Posts |
I know that it's authentic because my dad purchased this roll from the bank in 1984. The roll was shotgun, and took some time to unravel. I know it may look incised in the picture, but it is not.
Can someone post a pic of a double strike? Because this looks exactly like the double strike in my book.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
6563 Posts |
Banks aren't the only ones that can make a shotgun roll. And even though you got it from a bank the coin could have been damaged and then reentered circulation.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
214 Posts |
But such is not the case. I'm not certain why you continue rebutting what I know as true. The coin is an authentic mint error, and it can easily be determined that the coin has never been mishandled.
I examined it under a microscope and took two of the pictures under this magnification. I may be wrong about it being a CENTERED Double Strike, but the coin isn't damaged in the least nor ever circulated.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1173 Posts |
I'm not saying the doubting Thomases are wrong, but I'd sure like to see someone replicate this specific "look" with a vice, hammer or whatever. I don't see the Lincoln Memorial on the obverse as incused at all. I am, however, no expert on these sorts of things, so will wait until Coppercoins or another comes along.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
214 Posts |
Oh, one other thing, on the obverse you can tell the memorial design appears to run behind Lincoln's bust, and this proves it was not faked. A hammer or vice would not create this affect.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I still think this is a clash but like I said I am definately no expert on Lincoln cents and thats why I hesitate to say for a fact, but I will say by looking at the pictures the reverse image behind Lincolns head looks raised and not incuse like you would expect from a squeeze job
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
914 Posts |
I can't imagine that this coin is faked. The column under Lincoln's beard would be impossible any other way.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
499 Posts |
It is genuine error from the mint. It is a die clash, the raised sections you are seeing are actually the spaces BETWEEN the columns. This is one of the nicest die clashes I have seen on the lincoln but a die clash none the less.
Richard
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
I agree with Ziggy. If the coin was made from a pressing from another coin, the letters/head would be facing the opposite direction. A mirror image. But this coin is real and a very nice coin. Clashes happen a lot and are removed, but some coins after a clash happens get undetected. This is one of the strongest "Jail house Cents" I've seen. So very nice find. In fact re looking at your images, there was a doubled clash that happened or the first one wasn't totally removed. Here is what a vise squeezed Cent with another Cent will look like. https://www.coincommunity.com/forum...zed_Cent.jpgThis one sold on ebay and I asked if I could use his image of a faked double struck Cent and it was disfigured with another coin. He didn't respond. I guess he knew he had been caught. The buyer got a dud. On the squeezed Cent notice how the details come through the bust. On a die clash this doesn't happen. Why? During a die clash only the fields touch with the mark of the edges of the bust/memorial and sometimes letters show. The deeper details are lower into the die and wouldn't be affected. Just the fields. The devices do suffer from the cleaning. In later die states the edges of the devices loose sharpness. Making the strike not quite as clean when the die was new.
Edited by coop 11/21/2007 4:25 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
It is indeed a die clash error.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,180 |
|