| Author |
Replies: 22 / Views: 4,653 |
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Looking to put together a group of software names to recommend to people for image editing. What are you guys using? Let's see if we can get a list from free to expensive, from very minimal to very complex. They should all have a bare minimum of cropping, resizing, sharpening and preferably the ability to tune hues for color correction.
I'm most interested in the ones we can recommend to newer shooters just learning this stuff. I use the Gimp for everything, so I don't have any personal experience with smaller editors.
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
430 Posts |
I'm a total NOOB. I use Infranview to view and picasa to edit. totally free, very user friendly . I have used GIMP like you Sdave for pixel editing on a logo. It was a long time ago and I don't remember it being pleasant(hours of work deleted by hitting the wrong button).
|
|
Moderator
 United States
14463 Posts |
I use Picasa to edit pictures, then use Paint for size.
|
|
Valued Member
Australia
90 Posts |
PhotoScape - Free, for the average to the the enthusiastic imager, a little short for the advanced. Care needs to be taken when installing. The Installer offers "Browser Add-Ons"Resize Image in PhotoScape.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Til a week ago I used Nikon ViewNX2, the free software that comes with Nikon cameras, almost exclusively. Last week it crashed one too many times (incompatibility with another install) so now I'm using Digital Photo Professional, the free software that comes with Canon cameras. I don't find I need or want to do a lot of editing on an image. The more I do, the less natural the image looks. I do a minimum amount of sharpening, adjust levels so everything I want to see is visible and not blown-out, and color levels to match what I see in-hand.
Occasionally the simple programs can't cut it. This happens if my sensor is dirty and I need to do spot removal, or if the image is too contrasty, has uneven illumination, or has too many blown-out or dark details. For these images I resort to using Lightroom3. It has the features needed to fix these more difficult problems, but it doesn't have the other required features (like cropping). It also can do HDR, focus stacking, etc but I have not fully explored these capabilities.
For my focus stacking work I use Helicon Remote to do the captures, and Helicon Focus to do the stacking and 3D rendering.
For overlays and animations, I do the initial overlay/merging using Paint.net. If I do an animation with the images, I use ezgif.com/maker.
For adding notes to the images, or doing circle crops, I use PaintShopPro3 for Win95.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4227 Posts |
I use GIMP and have never had a problem with it. I love it for coin photos and other applications too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United Kingdom
575 Posts |
ACDSee Pro 8. Best I ever used.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3179 Posts |
Photoshop... been doing web design for 20 years of my 30 years in IT. It's what I'm used to...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9395 Posts |
I do two-step post-processing:
1) Final per-photo color temperature adjustment on each raw file, as needed, with Canon Digital Pro Professional (DPP). Then convert to TIFF with DPP.
2) Use Photoshop for cropping, levels adjustment, other adjustments (as needed), then downsize, and finally conversion to JPEG
Of course, Photoshop is going to a monthly subscription model, so I wouldn't recommended it now, unless you already have an old copy.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4593 Posts |
Paint.Net [freeware] from getpaint.net
-----Burton 50+ year / Life / Emeritus ANA member (joined 12/1/1973) Life member: Numismatics International, CONECA Member: TNA, FtWCC, NETCC, EveryCountry (online) coin club Owned by three cats and a wife of 40+ years (joined 1983) Author: 3rd Edition of the Sample Slabs book, https://www.sampleslabs.info/
|
|
Valued Member
United States
193 Posts |
I use Paint Shop Pro 7 for most of my editing. I have Gimp, too, but I think Paint Shop Pro is much more user friendly.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2815 Posts |
I use Adobe Photoshop CS5.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
627 Posts |
I use primarily Adobe Photoshop. I really like that it has gone to a monthly subscription. You always have the newest version, and the monthly "rental" is very affordable IMO. $10/mo sure beats the every couple years $400-500 license for a disc copy of the software.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1192 Posts |
I use cs5 photoshop. I absolutely detest the monthly rentals of software. There are too many programs that are that way. A lot of them if you lose internet connection they won't work or slow down trying to find the connection. I know eventially I will have to change but not right now. CAD is bad enough.
|
|
Moderator
  United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: You always have the newest version, and the monthly "rental" is very affordable IMO. $10/mo sure beats the every couple years $400-500 license for a disc copy of the software. Although I'm glad it works for you, many of my friends in the graphics industry are not only up in arms, but have walked away from Adobe products forever over this. It is admittedly far cheaper than it used to be under the old system, but you don't own anything and you're dead in the water if you lose Internet signal. Further, it requires you to connect at least every 30 days to reconfirm itself, so you can't even go on vacation (for instance) without leaving your computer up and running on the Internet while you're gone. And you have zero recourse if they feel like changing price or DRM (always connected, anyone?) in the future. This is intolerable, especially when for our purposes it offers no advantage whatsoever to free software. And it still offers zero to Linux users, because (like every version of Photoshop, ever) it doesn't run on Linux. And let's not even discuss the fact that Adobe leads the field by a wide margin in exploitable vulnerabilities. At another forum I patronize, catering to the IT demographic, they have a "Perpetual Yet Another Adobe Vulnerability" thread running continuously for the last 6 years so they can disseminate the newest vulnerability as quickly as possible.
|
| |
Replies: 22 / Views: 4,653 |