| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 4,451 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1158 Posts |
Obviously, I know the the answer to that. I am not compelled by the coin overlords to finish sets. But I just get SO bored working on sets. This year I was going to finally focus and just work on my Franklin half dollar set and I got bored after 3 coins and haven't even really looked at coins (or visited this site) since January. I only have 7 total out of the Franklin set and I just feel like I am done. I just started the hobby last year about this time with a bit of over zealousness and I started several sets and I just get bored so quickly. I have about 30 Kennedy halves for the set I was working on. I have 4 coins left in my 20th Type Set. I have 5 coins in a Canada Dollar Set. Not to mention about 50 other random coins. Is anyone else just a "random" collector? I like collecting coins, I just don't seem to enjoy being locked into set collecting - even type set collecting. I like stumbling on whatever I find interesting for that week/month and buying it. But then worry I'm going to end up with a disorganized mess of a collection with thousands of random coins with no clear value when I am done. Like I said, I've been sitting on the sidelines for 3-4 months and I'd like to get back in, but not sure what. Edited by tkbslc 05/04/2015 5:51 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
70 Posts |
I believe your dilemma is a good one. The bottom line is, whatever you like is all that matters. There are collector's that are very detailed, want everything in place, and only collect a specific coin/set. I am a lot like you, I become bored with a design, country, type of metal used etc etc etc. I think this is a really neat way to collect, I have a vast variety of everything from French Medals to Buffalo nickels, and everything in between. Just keep collecting, and enjoy the variety that we have at our disposal.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
My randomness is so random it qualifies as a pattern.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2669 Posts |
Dave..  Do tell. I'm also very random - I like them all. I collect everything.. medals, ancients, tokens, contemporary counterfeits, US, World, varieties.. and try to learn about everything. So now I know some about many but am an expert in none.. and that's ok. If I ever focus on something then I will; if not, I'll end up with a great and varied collection to boggle my children's minds with. Quote: The bottom line is, whatever you like is all that matters. Exactly  It's your collection, and your collection is what you define it to be.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
It is very hard to put together a complete set of anything because most series have key dates in them that are totally out of one's budget. I also like to buy a little bit of everything to quench my thirst of coins. this way I won't get bored of trying to concentrate on a single type of coin.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Well, imagine a 3D grid packed with intersecting lines. Only the truly random ones don't intersect anything - that's what "random" is about. If you fill the grid with enough intersecting lines, the room for the ones which can't possibly intersect anything can be calculated.
In other words, a pattern. You can always determine what "isn't" by calculating what "is" most accurately.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1192 Posts |
It's super common for early collectors to generalize and like collecting types. Overtime people choose what interest them the most. I tend to be somewhat random except that my collections are usually us silver coins 1916-1964. I collect some other stuff but only cheaply, nothing over.25-.50.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7614 Posts |
Collect and buy what YOU like.
If you are a random collector I'd suggest doing a 7070 type set.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18644 Posts |
Wow Dave that was very profound. It hurt my head 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9395 Posts |
I never really tried to complete any one series. A complete book or folder of cents, quarters, etc. never really appealed to me, although I had my share of Whitman Folders back when you could collect Buffalo nickels, Mercury dimes, and Standing Liberty quarters out of circulation. Of course, I never came close to completing any of these folders. Over the decades, my main collection was a US type set (with lots of extras), but this can never be completed, either. Coins like the 1796-1797 Half Dollar, 1796 no stars Quarter Eagle, and 1793 Chain Cent will forever be unaffordable (for me). After I reached the end of the line for the type set (missing almost all pre-1834 gold types, the flowing hair silver types (other than the half dollar), and most of the early cents and Half Cents), I gave up on true numismatic items. I then went on to cheap pre-1933 US/foreign gold (mostly) -- you can see some of these on the "How far back can we go? Third Edition - 2015" thread. Now I'm getting tired of these, too, after accumulating a tiny fraction of what's out there. It's hard to say what I'll move on to next, but I definitely won't be striving for completion.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1156 Posts |
I agree that the traditional idea of a set gets boring -- same old portrait or design, again and again. However, a set can be whatever you define it to be. I mostly collect world crowns, but my US set is simply one silver dollar from a each mint, all of different types.
*** Think outside the album! ***
Edited by jgenn 05/04/2015 11:20 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1839 Posts |
@ tkbslc
When I read your post the thing I took away from it was that you are fighting with boredom. You stated that you started in the hobby about a hear ago and have tried your hand at starting a number of different sets only to find yourself bored fairly quickly. Do I have that right?
If so then you are very much like many collectors in their first year. It's a time to get a feel for what interests you. So to that end I'd say don't worry about completing sets at this time especially if you find yourself getting bored. Perhaps what you might want to do is put most of your collecting time into learning about the coins that DO interest you. If you stumble upon a coin that you like, dig deeper by learning as much as you can about that coin or it's type or series, etc.. You've probably heard people say "buy the book before the coin". It sounds like a cliche but it's quite valid, especially at the crossroads you're finding yourself now.
If you take the time to learn as much as you possibly can about an area that interests you, you're likely to become even more interested. And learning can be done in so may ways. Reading here on these forums, in the many, many great numismatic books that are available at the library, online, or purchased. Learn from your local coin dealer or from a local or online coin club.
I'm sure I'm not telling you anything you don't already know but as you're finding yourself distracted, or your interests in completing a set is waning, why not take a step back and focus on learning all there is to know about a coin series that interests you.
And hopefully you'll get a second wind and end up with a hobby that makes you happy for a lifetime.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Quote: Wow Dave that was very profound. It hurt my head
Do like I do. Advil first, then type.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1158 Posts |
Quote: When I read your post the thing I took away from it was that you are fighting with boredom. You stated that you started in the hobby about a hear ago and have tried your hand at starting a number of different sets only to find yourself bored fairly quickly. Do I have that right? Not so much boredom, but feeling like I should be working toward organized sets when I enjoy reading about all different kinds of coins and collecting unorganized sets... Just still not sure what I want to do. So far, larger silver coins seem to give me the most joy. I fact, I started this whole thing by a relative giving me three older silver rounds as a birthday gift. Quote: If you are a random collector I'd suggest doing a 7070 type set. I've got most of a 20th Century type set done. I got frustrated when I got to the Barber coins and it's not a design that I like, but it costs a ton of money for good examples. I fear I'd run into that even more in the 19th century.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
589 Posts |
Tbone- I don't know if your teaching applies to tkbslc, but it is a great advise for others. I have been in and out of collecting coins for over 30 years. Had I understood this I would have never sold any of my coins due to lack of interest and thinking that I was done with it. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12815 Posts |
From the posts here, it sounds like there are a lot of us in (some degree) of your boat, tkbslc. I too am somewhat of an ADD collector. I jump around from set to set randomly...it's whatever captures my interest at the time. That said, in the long haul, all my sets get equal billing, so it really depends on the time frame in which you consider them. Week to week I probably seem like:  But if you look at my collecting on a scale of 5-10 years, things steady out quite a bit.
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 4,451 |