Posted 06/23/2015 7:08 pm
Welcome to Coin Community, GoodTimes17. Nice to see a new member posting their first in the VAM forum. 
You'll never know if it was a GSA coin if it were removed from the original GSA packaging. Probably not; only 5700 of the original mintage of 1.6 million 1891-CC's were in those sales. And without the packaging there is neither cachet nor added value so the point is moot.
The C3 Reverse is merely an identifier of the reverse hub used for that issue, and has no bearing on either variety or value. As regards clashing, it may help with attribution but given the extreme commonality of clashing on Morgans, it can only be an attribution aid rather than a definitive identifier.
Next step necessary is images.
You'll never know if it was a GSA coin if it were removed from the original GSA packaging. Probably not; only 5700 of the original mintage of 1.6 million 1891-CC's were in those sales. And without the packaging there is neither cachet nor added value so the point is moot.
The C3 Reverse is merely an identifier of the reverse hub used for that issue, and has no bearing on either variety or value. As regards clashing, it may help with attribution but given the extreme commonality of clashing on Morgans, it can only be an attribution aid rather than a definitive identifier.
Next step necessary is images.
sorry. My photos are not anywhere the quality I am seeing on this forum. However, I will post these two.
to CCF. It's always a pleasure to have another Morgan collector/ VAMmer join the community. As SsDd and COTW have already stated, pictures are needed in order to attribute your Morgan in question. The only thing I can add at this point is VAM-6 occurs in a clashed version apparently with no letter transfer as there is no note of such or a sub variety.
