| Author |
Replies: 39 / Views: 4,831 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Edited by Cascade 07/04/2015 2:17 pm
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
122 Posts |
I'm not an expert by any means, but my initial thought is cast counterfeit, well worn with plenty of post mint damage.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7390 Posts |
That was of coarse my first thought but its not magnetic & passes the ring test with flying colors. But now that I see the pics it does look like a cast. How did I miss that. I did the ring test and it's perfect so I didn't look close enough I guess Are there known silver cast counterfits?
Edited by Cascade 07/04/2015 2:02 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1414 Posts |
Check the date, the '1' definitely looks wrong....
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7390 Posts |
Ya jeff, I Feel stupid. I don't know, I think I was blinded by the ring test and set off on the wrong path. Just goes to show how even somewhat experienced people can get fooled. But boy does it sound exactly like silver
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7390 Posts |
I think I've been spending a little too much time in moderns lately
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4416 Posts |
I'm thinking that this may be an early 1900's counterfeit; perhaps, having some silver in the mix. To my experience, these were often mushy strikes. This purposeful appearance of having experienced much circulation (signaling acceptance in daily trade) made these issues all the more deceptive. The Morgan dollar and Barber coin designs tended to be most targeted. I've seen early dated Walkers looking like this, too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7390 Posts |
Exo, contemporary counterfit crossed my mind earlier and I was waiting to see if anyone thought that as well. I have zero experience with them like the micro o's and such. I wonder if Steve Caruso would know. Maybe I should ping him
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Inteeresting thread. I am clueless about this subject, and it is most interesting to learn more about it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4416 Posts |
I recently had a go-round of sorts over what constitutes a "contemporary" counterfeit. At what point does a counterfeit become non-contemporary? My own feeling is that ten, maybe twenty years, less than a generation in time, would justify the use of contemporary. I'd be curious to see what Steve has to say on this sub-topic as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7390 Posts |
Ok I'll ping him now but it's the 4th so he might not get back right away.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: Are there known silver cast counterfits? Cast pieces, even silver, will typically not ring or not ring well. Looks like a counterfeit struck from poor quality dies. Quite possibly contemporary and if so being silver would not be that unlikely. (silver prices were down and a silver fake dollar would only have about 50 cents worth of silver in it. Weight is too low.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4416 Posts |
BTW, the numerous, tiny marks on this suspected counterfeit could perhaps be explained by it having spent some time in a tumbler, bouncing about with other metal objects. One of the better known 19th century counterfeiters used to put his ancient "copies" in the hubs of his wagon wheels.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7390 Posts |
Exo, that could explain the very smooth almost river rock feel to the surfaces!?
Conder... I performed the ring test with this one and a real one in xf45 condition. Going back and forth about 10 times and I can say with certinty that I cannot distinguish between the two sounds
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1584 Posts |
Circulated genuine IMO. The date looks good to me. I don't see anything pointing to counterfeit.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
My first thought was and still is PMD.
|
| |
Replies: 39 / Views: 4,831 |