| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,195 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
75 Posts |
Hello. I have two Morgans that I am contemplating cracking out and regrading. Posted one earlier and this is the other one. Still honing my grading skills and would love an opinion on this coin. Maybe I put too much stock in eye appeal and it is graded accurately. Thanks for your help.   |
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
MS-62, semi PL obverse, nice toning  Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1295 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Unless this is a slam dunk MS65 there is no return for cracking and re-grading. CAC would be a more cost effective alternative.
I agree with MS63 with a shot at MS64.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
258 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The coin technically looks like a MS63. The coin does have nice toning and eye appeal, and I could see the coin being in a MS64 holder.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36745 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Absolutely a 64, shot at 65. Those fields are fantastic for a Morgan.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
What was this graded at?
Looks MS64 everyday to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3234 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18665 Posts |
MS64. This one has very nice eye appeal.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
I would say MS64, maybe a 65, but there isn't enough light on the cheek to tell.
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,195 |
|
Posted 07/21/2015 11:34 pm
