| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,895 |
|
|
New Member
United States
9 Posts |
 hello I am just going to post 2 questions if y'all don't mind helping me out IDing these. The last issue has the last 2 photos. Sorry ahead of time if there's any confusion. 1.) Coin -1956-D Issue - Double Struck Under Trust? Last 3 Letters. 2.) Coin - 1990 Proof? Issue - Does Is This Coin A Proof? Thanks for your help!    Edited by InDo420 09/12/2015 04:57 am
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3546 Posts |
'56: PMD'90: hard to make decision - poor lighting
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
932 Posts |
'90 does not appear to be a proof to me, 56 PMD.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
932 Posts |
Also  to the community! 
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
56-D post mint damage. 1990 not a proof., circulation strike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4227 Posts |
 the first coin took a hit on the bottom of Trust.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. PSD on the 56-D and not a proof on the 90. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12813 Posts |
 to CCF! I concur with the above assessments. Keep looking and have fun!
|
|
New Member
 United States
9 Posts |
Bahhh ok. Thx for yalls help! I swear the 56 looks like the outline of the letters in mention. Its almost to perfect of a strike to be PMD. But you guys/gals are the experts! Thx again!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6130 Posts |
The '56 is most likely what we call roller damage. Modern coin rolling machines very forcefully crimp the ends of the coin rolls, which can very often cause damage to the coin a few millimeters from the rim. Sometimes the damage is very minor; other times it can push entire features out of place.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3463 Posts |
A proof coin is a type of coin, not a grade. They are made with special highly polished dies.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,895 |
|