| Author |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,347 |
|
Valued Member
United States
260 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
And btw, we can see the luster is just dripping from how the light hits it and splits. That's called the "cartwheel" effect 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
260 Posts |
it does appear to be a VAM 2, the cc is definitely tilted along with the other markers. thanks for your input. greatly appreciated
|
|
Valued Member
United States
305 Posts |
I'd say MS62 !! I've seen coins with less hits go 61 but since she has the eye appeal and luster l will say 62 no problem .. I really like it , nice coin !!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
73 Posts |
I'd go no lower than a 62, possibly a 63. Even with that small mark under the wing, that reverse is a beauty to look at!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
Max ms63 due to multiple bag marks on obv.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The cheek looks a little baggy, I am going with MS63 because of the strong luster, nice reverse and solid strike.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1295 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
932 Posts |
in my opinion its a solid 62, the reverse is a very strong strike, however, the obverse is a tad baggy... overall, still a stunner.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2130 Posts |
MS-63 was my first guess. Nice looking CC.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
63 here as well. Nice-looking coin. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18702 Posts |
For me the obverse is too baggy for 63. My grade MS62
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
1153 Posts |
I will go MS 62. I like those die cracks, but that ding on the reverse is a bummer
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 21 / Views: 2,347 |