Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1900 Morgan Reverse Toned

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 979Next Topic  
Valued Member
Gene Carr's Avatar
United States
60 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2008  6:21 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Gene Carr to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I am about to submit some coins but do not want to pay $13 to get back a $25 coin.

How is this one looking?

Image: 1900-Morgan-Reverse-Toned IMG_1271.jpg
93.67 KB

Image: 1900-Morgan-Reverse-Toned IMG_1274.jpg
92.09 KB
Pillar of the Community
JimR's Avatar
United States
1490 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2008  6:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add JimR to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hmmm... I am trying to sharpen my Morgan grading skills so I will give it a shot first and see how I line up with everyone else.

First its a nice Morgan. I like the toning on the reverse

Obverse-MS64. The fields are pretty clean. If the cheek had less chatter I would say MS65
Reverse-MS65
Valued Member
mr merc's Avatar
United States
143 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2008  8:33 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add mr merc to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No expert and hard to tell from the obverse pic but I would say MS-63 and the reverse is beautiful. If I were you I'd just keep the coin out of a slab and enjoy it!
Pillar of the Community
Jaobler's Avatar
United States
6385 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2008  9:55 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jaobler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Gene Carr,

Luster isn't very strong on this Morgan but that could be more from the lighting and photo than because of any defect of the coin. There is lack of definition in Liberty's hair above the forehead and ear which is probably strike-related rather than wear.

It might be a slider AU, but I'd vote for uncirculated. The scuffs on the cheek would limit it to MS-64 at best IMO; strike weakness might bring it down a notch to MS-63. At that level I don't think it is worth spending the fee to have it graded. I agree with Mr. Merc: keep it raw and appreciate its beauty. Then use the money you didn't spend for grading, shipping, and insurance to buy another Morgan!

Valued Member
Gene Carr's Avatar
United States
60 Posts
 Posted 01/31/2008  10:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Gene Carr to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Wow,
I am glad you pointed out that flat brow hair. I missed that the dozen times I stared at her!
New Member
coinaday's Avatar
3 Posts
 Posted 02/01/2008  4:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinaday to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Most uncirculated 1900s I have seen have that same flat spot of hair
Pillar of the Community
Lucky_13's Avatar
United States
749 Posts
 Posted 02/01/2008  7:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky_13 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I would say..MS63 but the scratches on poor girls face are distracting. Still a keeper
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 02/01/2008  10:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm thinking 64. By 1903 the masters were pretty well worn; you can't expect huge strikes to be common among them. The marks on the cheek are of the "rub" type as opposed to the "gouge" type, and my guess is the coin looks nicer in-hand than in the pics. The mark right below the eye would be the kicker. The fields look excellent.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 979Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.36 seconds to rattle this change. Forums