| Author |
Replies: 31 / Views: 7,315 |
|
|
|
New Member
Romania
2 Posts |
hy, I have one 20 lei with Stefan cel Mare :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Norway
1358 Posts |
Just wondering, why Romania? Sure, they had some nice coins in the past, but a lot of the 'modern' coins are among the most boring I've seen. Especially the current series could double as a visual sedative.
Anyway, I think you're right about the 15-25 coinage. The Soviet Union had a 20 in between. I can't recall any other country or system with an equal system. (Talking about weird systems, I just returned from Iraq where I got my hands on a 4 Fils coin. They once had a system with coins of 1, 2 ,4, 5, 10, 20, etc. Fils, 1000 in a Dinar).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
Quote: Just wondering, why Romania? Sure, they had some nice coins in the past, but a lot of the 'modern' coins are among the most boring I've seen. Especially the current series could double as a visual sedative.
Anyway, I think you're right about the 15-25 coinage. The Soviet Union had a 20 in between. I can't recall any other country or system with an equal system. (Talking about weird systems, I just returned from Iraq where I got my hands on a 4 Fils coin. They once had a system with coins of 1, 2 ,4, 5, 10, 20, etc. Fils, 1000 in a Dinar). Mostly for the "nice coins in the past" part. (And some of my favorite Romanian types were from as late as the early 2000s.) Though I agree, the current series coins are extremely simplistic (not that this is really a problem). And, though I wasn't aware of it when starting this set, apparently the Bahamas had a 15-25 system at some point (not sure if they still do). I don't think I have an example of either denomination, though (coins from the Bahamas are a lot less common than coins from Romania).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
807 Posts |
The 1941 500 Lei, big commemorative silver "Moldova Lui Stefan In Veci A Romaniei", is actually quite common in my experience. Much more so than the 25 000 & 100 000 of 1946.
My records show that I have the 50 bani type of of 1873, 50 bani type of 1894, 1 leu dated 1866-1906 (double-headed type), 1 leu type of 1910, 2 leu type of 1910, 5 lei type of 1880, 500 lei of 1941, 500 lei of 1944, & 25 000 & 100 000 lei of 1946. That's not a bad group for a country I'm a casual collector of. None of them was probably more than $20, & mostly much less than that, with some pretty high grades.
Edited by publius 05/17/2016 05:45 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
$20 is a lot of money. I thought that, with the lowering prices of silver in January, I would be able to buy the smaller silver coins for $5 or so; I hadn't found any so far (and the silver prices went up again).
I also seem to find very few pre-1960 Romanian coins (almost all I find are either from the 1960-1982 period, overpriced recent coins, or commemoratives).
I did, however, buy a new (to me) type recently: 10 bani 1952 (type 52 on the list). That means 31 down, 49 to go (plus the silver). Almost done with the third leu (1952-2006). Only a few types to go, most of them from the 1950s or 1990s; will probably make a list later.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
Got two new Romanian types from my coin shop visit yesterday...
8. 5 bani 1882 49. 5 bani 1963
That's 33 down, 47 (plus silver) to go. And only one to go in the 1960-1982 period - type 65, 3 lei 1963 (and, if I didn't miscount, only seven to go in the entire third leu series - that one plus three 1950s types and three 1990s types).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
From today's coin shop visit:
21. 2 lei 1941 34. 2000 lei 1946 (silver plated, apparently) 68. 5 lei 1992-2006 (1992) plus one 10 lei commemorative (not on the list due to very low mintage - I got lucky)
That's 36 down, 44 to go, and the rest will be tricky.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
I'll have to recheck, but I think it's my first new Romanian type in a while:
60. 50 bani 1955-6 (1955)
Very beautiful coin, and one I really wanted to get as soon as I started to consider this whole type set business.
Okay, checking on Numista, I have 39 types, while this list says I have 37... let me check... oh, I'm not counting the silver 200 lei, and there's two commemorative types not on my list due to their very low mintages, so Numista is actually one coin short (the 20 lei 1943, as far as I can tell - as it happens, I know where that coin is and I know I didn't put the coins from that particular pile on my Numista account yet). [Then I noticed that the 10 bani 1952 was not on my Numista account either - I put it there now - so there's really one coin missing; see below for the identity.]
Anyway, I still need the 1 and 3 bani from the 1950s, the two 1 leu types from the 1990s (I'm pretty sure I have one of those, but can't find it here or on Numista), and the 50 lei and non-commemorative 10 lei also from the 1990s. Then I'd be done with the third leu - first and second are trickier (and the modern coins aren't really worth bothering with, they're way to common).
And, I've recounted it about six or seven times now, but I think I can be sure this time: 38 coins down, 42 to go. (The missing coin is the 1 ban 2005, type 77.)
Edited by january1may 10/01/2016 5:31 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
While I didn't add any new countries during my Vernisage visit on the 6th of November, I did add one Romanian type: 5 lei 1930 (type 22 on the list). Seriously overpaid for it though ($1.5 for an obviously scratched example).
That's 39 down, 41 to go, and I'm highly unlikely to make it this year (or even by the first anniversary of the thread).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Norway
1358 Posts |
Then make it a b i-yearly project... nothing wrong with that. If you find one more coin this year, you're exactly halfway!
I've been trying to get some type sets completed but it's sometimes difficult to get hold of something without either being grossly overcharged or just not finding the quality you'd like to have. Especially for the more or less rare to very rare coins, it's sometimes a test of patience.
Anyway, would be great if you could post a pic of what you have now, or an overview or so. It'd be great to see the collection!
ps. can I ask you how you count to get to 80 coins? A type set of all coins issued for circulation is 124 coins, for what I know...
Edited by UltraRant 11/10/2016 3:50 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
Quote: Then make it a bi-yearly project... nothing wrong with that. If you find one more coin this year, you're exactly halfway! I expect to find more than one new type this year, so I'd be more than halfway (as far as the 80 number is concerned - see below - though now that I actually have a job, and recently received my first paycheck, I might even make some progress into the rest). I certainly have no problem with extending this, however! Quote: I've been trying to get some type sets completed but it's sometimes difficult to get hold of something without either being grossly overcharged or just not finding the quality you'd like to have. Especially for the more or less rare to very rare coins, it's sometimes a test of patience. I don't really care much about quality - as long as I can identify the coin, it's nice enough. I do rather prefer coins that don't have obvious damage though (which sadly wouldn't include my latest addition - really overpaid for that). That said, I somewhat understand what you're saying - I've been looking for some of the less common types for months or even years (though often this is because I set improbably low price standards). Quote: Anyway, would be great if you could post a pic of what you have now, or an overview or so. It'd be great to see the collection! I didn't really put it together, it's all over the place. I can certainly try though - it would be a neat idea! Quote: ps. can I ask you how you count to get to 80 coins? A type set of all coins issued for circulation is 124 coins, for what I know... I've mostly explained my decisions in the OP. TL/DR is that I excluded all gold (obviously), all single-year commemoratives (even if circulating), and sent silver coins to another category (actually two other categories, by size - silver prices were extremely low in dollar terms when I started the thread, so I thought I might be able to afford the smaller silver pieces, but probably not the larger ones). Specifically, there are a further 12 small silver coins and 14 large silver coins listed in the OP beyond the 80 list; that gets us to 80+12+14=106. Adding the 4 specifically listed commemoratives gets us to 110; that plus the 6 types of commemorative 50 bani coins is 116. (One of those probably did not yet exist when I started the thread.) I guess you got 124 from the Numista list - if so, the other 8 types are gold (five 1906 types and three more types of 20 lei), of which I obviously don't have any. I never got any more of the circulating commemoratives (not even the eclipse), but I did get a few NIFC 10 lei types from the 1990s (one of them was mentioned in the OP).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Norway
1358 Posts |
Quote: though now that I actually have a job, and recently received my first paycheck First of all, congrats on getting a job and receiving the first paycheck! I remember the magic of getting my first paycheck after a month of full time work. I do also recall that the magic disappeared at once when I saw how much I had to pay in taxes, costs and bills that month. Not much left for my ultimate goal with my first paycheck: to buy a certain book series all at once. Quote: I don't really care much about quality [...] I do rather prefer coins that don't have obvious damage though I actually set a first quality standard for most of my type sets: at least VF or the local equivalent. I'll update from there if it's a reasonable option. I fully agree on damage, though! No damaged coins for me! Quote: I can certainly try though Would love to see pics! Quote: TL/DR Sorry about that, but yes, that's what happened.  Thanks for the summary! It makes sense to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
My first large silver! 500 lei 1944 (type 12 on the list). Sadly the coin is holed, and I heavily overpaid ($10). I guess I was far too happy. Unfortunately, due to an unlucky finger injury I received a few hours after my previous comment here, I wasn't in a position to buy many coins for most of the last few weeks (and my trip to Moscow's weekly coin show this Sunday wasn't particularly helpful either - I bought a few dozen other coins, including a Russian type I've long been looking for*, but only one Romanian). *) definitely a test of patience for that one - the type is extremely rare, and normally sells for $20+ (well above what I wanted to pay), but I found it in a bargain bin for 30 cents
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Norway
1358 Posts |
In that case, bargain is quite the understatement. Good job on the Kopek!
I think the silver content value of the Romanian coin is about $5 now. Sometimes I just keep a coin as a placeholder until I find a better sample. You can always try to sell it again for that price! :)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Russian Federation
5177 Posts |
New additions in January 2017:
12. 10 bani 1900 (drilled center hole, not sure why - the seller had several examples, all with similar holes) 17. 50 bani 1921 5. 50 bani 1910 (small silver)
I also got a much better example of the 500 lei 1944, for $6 (I forgot it was the one large silver type I had already), and passed on some other Romanian types (which I considered too expensive at the moment). I also finally found an example of the eclipse 500 lei, but it was rather expensive, and came in an ugly 2x2 holder.
Best guess at stats: 41 down (+2 small silver, +1 large silver), 39 to go (+10 small silver, +13 large silver). At this point I really should do a checklist of which base metal types I don't have yet (preferably in several columns... something like 1867-1921, 1924-1947, 1947-1960, and 1963-2006).
|
| |
Replies: 31 / Views: 7,315 |