| Author |
 Replies: 14 / Views: 1,374 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
I had a hard time finding one of these within a budget   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
374 Posts |
Slightly clearer pictures:   |
|
Valued Member
United States
374 Posts |
This was the flip it came in. Was this optimistic thinking on the part of the guy (or gal) who sold this to me?  |
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
Not just optimistic but possibly fraudulent. Spending two minutes with PCGS photograde would clarify that this does not make good, let alone Vg-F.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6396 Posts |
I don't see a serious cleaning issue given the wear. Obverse is AG, reverse is maybe G-6. The small cut on M of AMERICA is a minor distraction. Seems like a decent filler for this scarce date.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36878 Posts |
Obverse brings this one to an AG-3
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
The updated pics clarified the cleaning issue......not cleaned.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree AG-03 and just a straight-out deception on the grade.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18708 Posts |
Maybe they were grading the reverse
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
521 Posts |
Reverse is almost better (minus the hit)than the VG-8 pic in my ANA book. The obverse is weaker than the AG-3 pic. Net at G-4 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
G-06 slider. The obverse may be worn, but the reverse has nice full rims, and has strong detail.
|
|
New Member
United States
42 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,374 |
|
Posted 01/26/2016 02:32 am
