Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

A Cob - Counterfeit - Forgery Or What?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,280Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2016  8:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I too would like to know Wienburg's take on the coin or comments.

I would also love to see the references to counterfeit coins taken from any original source documents.

These need to be broadcast so everyone knows what they say. Too many of these documents sit hidden away in private collections for decades between sales and the valuable information they contain is not utilized.
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2016  11:44 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Fred indicated -

I had this piece shipped to me, and I showed it around
to some folks at Long Beach a few weeks ago.

Consensus is that it's a counterfeit 1R/cob/whatever, struck over a genuine 1845-O dime.

JPL: The rules for counterfeits or Colonial errors CHANGE and even Mike Diamond of Coin World more often than not has no opinion. In other words when examining pieces like this it a whole different school of experience as with U.S. Colonials. In this case I notice how well struck up the word DIME is here - as a host coin do we expect this scenario from a more sophisticated steam mint press (i.e., in other words more host motif being obliterated of the under-type). Of course. Perhaps a table top screw press was used leaving MUCH MORE of the host motifs INTACT IMO.

Everyone agrees its real but Fred and Mike do not cross over in terms of purchasing Colonials or counterfeit issues ... for whatever reasons and rarely give opinions. Their research and purchases is strictly U.S. Federal ... IMO. For this reason and a little luck its being shipped to Gurney rather than sitting in a U.S. Federal Coin collection. LOL. IMO - again.

JPL
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2016  5:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That is interesting that he passed on the coin but fortunate for me. It falls in the same general class of re-purposing such as using a Large cent for a clock gear or a washer. It is a re-use of a Federalist coin albeit for nefarious purposes.

It is now in my possession and I love it. I think it did in fact circulate after being re-stamped - there is significant wear on the 1R design. The host was a rather high grade coin so it had not circulated long before it was re-struck.

I have researched coin wear rates and studies are all over the place. The article with the shortes length of life indicated that a silver dime dropped from MS to F12 in just over a year! More conservative estimate run to as long as 10 years. So even using the very conservative figure of 10
years that would date the restrike at 1855 at the very latest. So for whatever reason, someone was testing dies for a 1 reale in the period of time just before they ceased being legal tender in the US (1857).

Does anyone who collects cobs know when the first reports of systematic collection began? Could collectors have shown enough interest in this series by 1855 to warrant a forger making these dies for the purposes of Numismatic forgery?
  Previous TopicReplies: 18 / Views: 3,280Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to rattle this change. Forums