| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 4,646 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1373 Posts |
Just curious.......if the Commonwealth coinage continuous, what is the actual 'ladder' it will go with? I had thought the after Queen Elizabeth II, it would go: 1) Prince Charles 2) his 2nd wife (don't know, or care, of her name) 3) Prince William 4) Princess Catherine 5) William & Catherine's oldest son I have heard that my #2 on the list is wrong, but I don't know the facts. Anyone? 
Edited by atticguy 05/13/2016 1:36 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2845 Posts |
"Queen Elizabeth II is the present sovereign and her heir apparent is her eldest son, Charles, Prince of Wales. Next in line after him is Prince William, Duke of Cambridge, the Prince of Wales's eldest son. Third in line is Prince George of Cambridge, the son of the Duke of Cambridge, followed by his sister, Princess Charlotte of Cambridge in fourth place. Fifth in line is Prince Henry of Wales, the younger son of the Prince of Wales." More - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suc...itish_throne****** Spouses aren't in the line because royalty involves succession through bloodlines.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1373 Posts |
Ahhh, thank you wildflower! Reading most of the Wikipedia info has enlightened me considerably. All this time I had thought that George VI was the Queen Elizabeth's husband; now I understand that he was her father. It really explains the 'spouse' problem I had. I also should have know to check the internet first before I asked a question. Shame on me :(
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2845 Posts |
Hey no proble atticguy! I haven't quite got it figured out either, for example why Queen Elizabeth's husband is referred to as Prince Phillip (Duke of Edinburgh) whereas for example other spouses take on the tiles ie King George/Queen Mary.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3690 Posts |
Quote: Canadian culture? What is that? Canadian culture in one word: Eavestrough.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
We need the Royals. Who better can you have for opening your local County fair?  Aussies and Canadians don't have to pay for them, leave that to the Poms. Nevertheless, their prestige and heritage as our Head of State is something that the poor 'ole Americans just have to put up with.  In this case, I just love being a snob! 
Edited by sel_69l 05/13/2016 10:05 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
At some point, the British monarchy became owned by the British people and the extended empire rather than the monarchy owning the people. The dirty work of politics is now left to the prime ministers and the houses while the monarchy represents the history and all that is good in the history of the British empire. I feel that people identify the royal family as our own or a part of their shared history and culture. Even here in the US, people identify with the royal family as it is where we originally came from as well. It is much easier to like the royals when they are hosting the Invictus Games or celebrating the 75th anniversary of the Battle of Britain than when they are trying to rule and tax you into submission. People like to feel a part of something bigger than the day to day slogging through of life and the Royal family represents that I think.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
Before 1776, a lot of Americans and all British shared the same heritage. Why shouldn't Americans welcome H.M. the Q when she visits? That's just the same, as with Canadians and Australians.
I just love the tradition of the Union Jack in the corner of the Australian Flag. So do Hawaiians.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
@sel I agree. But the reason it is not done so much is the lack of teaching of American history in our own schools. Being a patriotic American is not the goal of the current "education" system programming our kids. In fact the sad truth is most people here cannot even name the presidents on our own coins and currency (no exaggeration), let alone know anything of our historic roots. This is the current trend and falls in line with current political goals.
I ask people all the time who are on our coins etc. Very few get beyond Lincoln being on the cent and (maybe) Washington on the quarter.
Edited by Earle42 05/17/2016 8:26 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
Earle42: Sadly, Australia is going the same way. A step along the way to a one World government.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
2845 Posts |
The first time I read George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four" was in the early 70s and it really didn't really grab my attention. It just seemed a little far-fetched. But during more recent years the book was mentioned in passing from time to time, so I read it again. Wow, it amazed me. For a book written in 1949, there are so many similarities in the world we live in today that have crept into place slowly and surely and without much notice.
"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." George Orwell, 1984
Edited by wildflowerAB 05/18/2016 11:31 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
It is also enlightening to go back to the Bible's predicting a one world government system. Men try to shun it, men try to ridicule it, and they continue to play out what is within its covers. Mankind, as a whole, never changes at the most important levels.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
|
| |
Replies: 27 / Views: 4,646 |