Here is one rare bird. This coin is a 64-5 Gem beauty VVEDS coin. (there is a tick on the cheek).
There is a distinct loop within the main 2 in the date. IT IS NOT
Machine Doubling! So, don't bother with that. That is ridiculous.
The initial underdate lays to the left of the main 2. It had to be from the initial hubbing of the die. There is absolutely no sliding of metal whatsoever around the innermost digit. It is a very flat and well demarcated extra numeral. If ya was tiny enough you could fall off the edge. It is VVEDS. Tight and very smooth planchet around the inner rim area.
The doubling to the left of the base of the 2 is picture shadowing. It is not on the coin. The doubling to the right of the top of the 4 is some slight doubling.
I cannot make out with certainty any vertical serif indication in the back V area of the backside of the 2. (right side of 2)
I have noticed that the circumference of the inner numeral within the loop of the 2 does not seem to match that of the main numeral 2. It may be the upper left curved part of the roman numeral 1. The numeral 1 has a larger circumference than that of the 2 used on this coin.
Being that the extra metal was from the initial hubbing imprint in the die, it lays low to the field. I cannot imagine that too many coins were struck before the impression faded into oblivion. Rare coin by virtue of manufacture.
So, over-date or double date? The dealers I know usually defer to me on this question. They wonder the same. Maybe time for overlays.
Anyone seen another?
I have had the coin for a very long time. I cherry picked it.
Hope you enjoy the photos. They are the best that I have for now.
G...
Image:
1942ddate.jpg18.08 KB
Image:
1942ddate2.jpg42.43 KB
Image:
1942ddate3.jpg19.05 KB
Close up of 2 added.
Image:
42over1pic2.jpg12.27 KB
Image:
42over1.jpg24.14 KB