Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1982-D Quarter Narrow I

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 939Next Topic  
New Member

United States
4 Posts
 Posted 02/25/2008  2:40 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add raptor7s to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Was is normal for the 1982D Quarter to have a narrow I in America?
The upper image is the 82D, while the lower one is an 84D for comparison.

Thanks.

Image: 1982-D-Quarter-Narrow-I wq1.jpg
84.54 KB
Pillar of the Community
j_h_s's Avatar
United States
1934 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2008  02:03 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add j_h_s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
raptor, would you post a few more pictures of other letters on the coin. I see Mechanical Doubling on the "C" and "A" next to the "I" you're asking about.

New Member
United States
4 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2008  09:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add raptor7s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
OK, here are a couple of other pictures. You will also notice a little doubling on the R. Note the distance between the R and the I.

Image: 1982-D-Quarter-Narrow-I qfullam.jpg
83.52 KB

Image: 1982-D-Quarter-Narrow-I qfwd.jpg
89.71 KB
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2008  09:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's not ' Mechanical Doubling', it's Machine Doubling.

And the thinner letters are likely the result of overpolishing the die.
Pillar of the Community
j_h_s's Avatar
United States
1934 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2008  10:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add j_h_s to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, copper...i sat here at whatever a.m. this morning making my Libran guess whether it's Machine or Mechanical...on a 50/50 uneducated bet...i aint so good. Is there such a thing as "mechanical" doubling or is "machine" THE terminology?

Jim


Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 02/26/2008  11:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No such thing as " Mechanical Doubling". It's ALWAYS " Machine Doubling".

Just like there's no such thing as a "double die" - it's ALWAYS "doubled die".

I know these sound like flyspeck semantics, but I want the people I'm educating to use the proper terms, and to start off early is to start off well. If you learn and use the proper terms people are much more likely to take you seriously when it's your turn to do the educating. It's a lot like using proper English when writing. If you don't use basic punctuation, capitalization, and spelling rules when writing a professional paper, people are not likely to read it except to note the flaws.
New Member
United States
4 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2008  11:25 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add collector001 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Years ago I noticed quarters 1980-D, 1981-D, 1982-D, 1983-D, and 1984-D all come with reverses where the letters, especially EPU, are quite thin. The field on these quarters is also much more reflective than normal quarters. The same thinness appears on the proof quarters of these same years. I can not say if this represents a new reverse die variety or not. I sent an example to Cion World Collector Clearinghouse and they came to the conclusion that this was caused by overpolishing. This may be true but I believe there is more to the story. Why only at the Denver mint? Also the numbers are quite high. For 1983-D about 40% of finds in my area have this "variety". The art work does seem to be the same, although I haven't studied this for some years. The question that still interest me is, were the proof dies prepared differently enough to change the appearance of the art work and were some of these dies used for circulation strikes like the type B reverse quarters of 1969-D through 1972-D? Whether or not they are a different variety I do have an example in my collection.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2008  1:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Designs on Cents vary from year to year on both obverse and reverse. Some style changes were used for one year or for several years. This could be true on Quarters also. (I'm a Cent man myself) But on the 1980 Quarters the bust is different sizes for different years. The best way to see if yours is normal is to compare it to others examples from the same year/mint mark. Differences may occur, but view other coins that are BU will help you determine if this is just part of the norm for that year/mint mark. When you compare coins with others years, you will note differences. but if they are the way they were made, no extra value for them is associated.
Pillar of the Community
livingdinasaur's Avatar
United States
1571 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2008  2:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add livingdinasaur to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thnink of MD this way: The MACHINE does the doubling, NOT the Mechanic.
Dick
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 939Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Forums