| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,676 |
|
|
Valued Member
Serbia (Srbija)
66 Posts |
Its a 1941 banknote with sixes in abundance. I would appreciate your comments.
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 Serbia (Srbija)
66 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Poland
3201 Posts |
On this note, we've got 2295, 666, and then 57366665 beside the signatures.
Which of them is the series indication, which is the actual serial number, and what is the third number?
|
|
Valued Member
 Serbia (Srbija)
66 Posts |
Its 57366666. I don't know which number is what. Thanks
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
Considering the numerology, it's appropriate that the allegorical figure appears about ready to open the Seventh Seal and unleash its' contents upon mankind.
Nice note.
|
|
Valued Member
Sweden
71 Posts |
Actually, all numbers on the banknote are the part of the numeric protection of Yugoslav banknotes made between 1919-1943:
A = 2295 B = position of the letter before A (2295) in the cyrilic alphabet = 17 C = 666 N = 57366665
Insert the above numbers in the following formula:
N = 25,000*(A-1) + 1000*(B -1) + C
which gives: 57366665 = 57366666 ! Numbers are not equal! Banknote is a fake one!
And in the case worth a little bit more than the original note in the same quality.
|
|
Valued Member
 Serbia (Srbija)
66 Posts |
Please look closer, The number on rhe bill is 57366666. It has a watermark, a head of King Alexander I, as all my other 100s from 1941 do. Banknote is NOT FAKE, regardless of your comment on value. Best regards
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Poland
3201 Posts |
When you enlarge the image, however crudely, the last digit starts looking more like a 6 indeed... 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
992 Posts |
It certainly isn't a '5'. Definitely a '6'
|
|
Valued Member
Sweden
71 Posts |
Well, in this case, the note is NOT fake, and worth definitely less :-(
|
|
New Member
United States
18 Posts |
Fake or Legitimate, it's really a pretty note, if I must say so myself...
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,676 |
|