| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 1,097 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
67 Posts |
Having a bit of trouble getting perfect focus photos uploaded that meet the minimum requirements. Please bear with me. I am thinking XF-? on this coin. looking for some education And pointers. Thank you, Bill   |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7645 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
Xf+ details cleaned badly
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
VF-30, cleaned. It has low eye appeal.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
67 Posts |
Here is a group showing actual color of $2.50 coin. I believe this indicates better eye appeal. Also, I would appreciate the indicator(s) of being cleaned. Respectfully, Bill  Edited by QE45
08/04/2016 5:44 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18720 Posts |
Wow, if thats the real color in the grouping your first pics are pretty bad. I think it can make AU50. the detail in the feather grouping over the cheek is very detailed. this is a high point on the obverse and should show the most wear
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Must agree. Not fond of the upper obverse scratches, but no longer think it has been cleaned. AU-50.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36905 Posts |
I'm with you Frog, the detail of an AU coin is there, eye appeal is lousy though but I attribute some of that to the photos.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5838 Posts |
How taking pictures the wrong way can make the coin looks bad, and even more pronounce when you enlarge the image with all the flaws showing up. I can say that's an mid-AU coin from the last group.
Now I am thinking flawed coins with good camera skill can overlook imperfections.
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,097 |
|
Posted 08/03/2016 7:27 pm
