| Author |
 Replies: 17 / Views: 2,185 |
|
Valued Member
United States
280 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7627 Posts |
XF45 to AU50 in my opinion. Obv pic is a little dark.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
403 Posts |
50-53 assuming the obverse has more luster than images show.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36839 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1660 Posts |
Are the obverse and reverse different colors in hand, Scarp?
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
280 Posts |
The areas on the hair and the cheek that look dark on the picture, look dark in hand, too.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I guess AU-50 - though the obverse appears more worn than that.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
280 Posts |
I have a chance to buy it at the Grey Sheet price.
Judging from everyone's replies,
it's an typical AU50,
not exceptionally nice for the grade,
but not a borderline XF45, either.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Still don't like the obverse. Your call. Don't buy by price. Do you really like the coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Buy it as a XF-40 or XF-45, haha.
IMHO it's AU50
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18687 Posts |
AU50 also. if you did not purchase it yet make sure you have return policy as there is probably some reason why the reverse pic is much sharper and brighter than obverse
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
130 Posts |
I'd go with AU-50. I feel the obverse has a just little too much wear for the grade, but the reverse looks really nice with very little wear, which bumps it up to be a solid AU-50, imo. That said, I'd almost say the photos look like they are from two different coins.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
280 Posts |
Better picture of the obverse:  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,185 |
Posted 08/21/2016 2:24 pm
