| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 979 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
How low can you go?   Note that the "O" has a distinct tilt to the right, but I don't think its precise location matches up with that for an "O/CC" variety. Colligo ergo sum
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3516 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18712 Posts |
i think you have a winner! P01
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
It looks like it could make PO-1.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Solid Poor 1.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
I think this one would squeeze into the P-01 :)
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36880 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
PO-01 for sure - super example.  |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1391 Posts |
Where'd you find it, if I may ask?
Nice coin!
Edited by The Silver Searcher
11/29/2016 5:26 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5255 Posts |
An impressively worn coin-is it the biggest loser?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4883 Posts |
Quote:
Where'd you find it, if I may ask? It was one of a quartet of Morgans I plucked out of a dealer's cull bin yesterday. The other three {circulated, but not true lowballs) can be seen here: http://goccf.com/t/274659The consensus seems to be that it's P01 - so the next logical question is if it was yours, would you submit it to either NGC or PCGS? Is one of those more likely than the other to certify it as poor? And realistically, would there be actual market value (and buyers) if it in fact came back at that lowest grade? Colligo ergo sum
Edited by Lucky Cuss
11/30/2016 5:51 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4883 Posts |
Just one more comment (at the risk of straying somewhat off-topic) - as crazy as it may seem given this specimen's advanced state of wear, I think based upon the close slanted date and the postion of the "O" that it might actually be identifiable as a VAM-6. Wouldn't it be a bit bizarre if it could be certified as P01 with a VAM attribution to boot? Colligo ergo sum
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 979 |
|
Posted 11/28/2016 8:44 pm
