| Author |
Replies: 53 / Views: 7,296 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Alan I see what you mean BUT there are just few slight surface marks in the frosty devices of your posted coins - not a ton of dings and deep chatters on the original posted coin, alot on obverse but still many on reverse!. Everybody has their opinions in a socially calm way that's why I really like this site!!
Edited by Mark1959 12/30/2016 7:54 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
4911 Posts |
luster is completely broken on the cheek, jaw and brow, there is a long fine scratch in front of the face, from the lower area of the crown all the way to the king's nose, the lower left field of the obverse shows noticeable chatter as well as some black spots. there is also a major hit in between the "A" and "D" in "CANADA" and some noticeable chatter under the crown on the left as well and scattered luster breaks. this coin in my opinion is an MS-64.
Feel free to call me Will.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
If you compare it to the other MS66's in same auction, especially the vicky, this is clearly a lesser coin. It does compare nicely with the MS65 gold coins though.
At any rate, I would be happy to own any of these coins.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
3234 Posts |
Thanks for the views on the previous 34.. ..now here is another.."Not perfect pics".. but much nicer (my opinion) than the NGC 66+ offered at the top.. This has to go to PCGS..When flipping from screen to screen on these 2 obverses.. I feel that the band with the 8 jewels is better defined with this 34 when looking above the forehead.... Do you see a difference in the strike of these 2 34's..? Any opinions or critiques much appreciated again..   .
Edited by DEVLEC 12/30/2016 9:29 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2495 Posts |
Yes, it's nicer and a better grade, but the first coin (NGC ms66) got at least a one full point bump for color toning attractiveness.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
3234 Posts |
Quote: I do not know how PCGS would grade this coin now but it was in a PCGS 66 holder when it sold for $6,250 through Heritage in April of 2011. Everest..Thanks for that important added knowledge on the 34 from the previous page one..PCGS gave it a 66...way back when..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4233 Posts |
It's got the D. Moore pedigree and the toning. If I submitted it plain white from grandpa's coins, MS64 or 65 maybe. That junk in front of the chin is nasty, as are multiple serious hits on the reverse. And don't forget NGC gave it a "+". So they thought it was almost a 67.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
I think there is a bit of camera blur on 2nd coin. It looks very nice, but photos are nit of same quality. It could pass for 66, but might be a 65+ technical due to hit in front of mouth. The toning is not as nice, but looks pretty good. It would be interesting to see them with same camera setup ir side by side. The color of the 1st is had to beat.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Looks like a MS-65 to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
7096 Posts |
Coin #1 Obverse; Lots of (Chatter) on the kings cheek and neck also a couple of large hits in front of the chin with bagmarks below. Legends are nice and clean with some nice toning throughout. Reverse; Many heavy hits in the bottom half of the fields on the coin and the legends and design are bagged up. Once again the toning is pleasing. MS64, Some graders may see this as MS63 even.
Coin#2 Obverse; Contact marks in front of the king some could be significant ( Hard to tell from these images)also some minor contact marks behind the head. A few minor marks in the legends but not too distracting. Reverse; 3 minor hits above the second "A" in CANADA, Some minor hits in the legends and design but not too distracting. MS65 once again this could be seen as MS64 by some.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
3234 Posts |
There is a bit of blur and that's my fault. Luster is more complete but finer on coin # 2. Less hits and contacts on #2 also.
Shooting through 2 sheets of plastic is very tricky at times. Almost impossible to completely eliminate some glare and then keep the focus perfect..
It's very hard to find a perfect 1934 Canada 50 cent coin.
I also wish that I knew the pedigree on this # 2...Maybe one day, if Michael or Abe would do me that pleasure..
Thanks again for the detailed responses....!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1505 Posts |
The 2nd one is yours or soon to be? Very nice.
How is the color, I always find it difficult to accurately capture the color and details, HA usually does a really nice job, and you can see everything, as in coin #1.
I agree about photos through plastic. Is it ICCS? Is so, grade?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
@Everest - bingo on the input.
Color and eye appeal can mask a lot of sins, which is why grading (and buying!) is not a science. The coin is spectacular to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
The gouge in front of George's chin on the first coin precludes a 66 grade, it looks quite recent in fact. The fields of the second coin appear to warrant at least a 65, maybe 66 in hand. However I don't consider the strike quality to be above par, the vertical beads,fleur de lis, and central parts of the maltese crosses on the obverse are not sharp. The jewels in the ermine band of the crown are not evident at all,there is a mushiness and lack of detail directly below the chin, as well there is softness at the apex of the ribbon. At MS66 or above I prefer to see an above average strike showin most of the detail the designer intended.
I don't understand why anyone would move a PCGS 66 Canadian coin to an NGC holder.A move that could cost a couple of thousand dollars at auction.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
3234 Posts |
Quote:
I don't understand why anyone would move a PCGS 66 Canadian coin to an NGC holder.A move that could cost a couple of thousand dollars at auction. DBM....Well said and appreciated as usual..and nice input by many above.. ..but no other pics available at this time..
|
| |
Replies: 53 / Views: 7,296 |