| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,469 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
900 Posts |
Edited by Potbellypub 02/02/2017 10:46 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2563 Posts |
PMD, looks like a grinder and/or parking lot coin
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1699 Posts |
Agreed. Some form of artificial wear has exposed the zinc core on the highest portions of the design and rim.
The conclusion is supported by the absence of any design rim and the exposure of zinc only on the high parts of the design.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34447 Posts |
fine grit sandpaper maybe
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
891 Posts |
 Parking lot or?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1000 Posts |
Rim's gone, so sanded. I would disagree with parking lot because the uneven asphalt leaves notable pitting on the surface. Belt grinder is my guess. Abrasion seems too even to have been done by hand.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1696 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
900 Posts |
Edited by Potbellypub 02/02/2017 10:42 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1000 Posts |
I'm sticking with belt sander. There's a bit of give in the belt, and it looks like the coin was held from one edge and rotated, note more missing material in upper right? If you sanded by holding the coin and sandpaper, it would wear unevenly. It looks like you set the sandpaper down on a table and rubbed the coin against that. In that case, the highest raised surfaces would wear first.
My final guess: belt sander, but the person who did it did so with the goal of removing the rim entirely. Coin was not held at a flat 180 degrees to the belt, but at an angle. If I had access to a belt sander at the moment, I'm sure I can replicate it.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
900 Posts |
My best uneducated guess would have to go towards a dryer or washing machine coin that was discovered early too perfect to be done by human hands using an abrasive it has the same amount of wear on both sides in the same spots and no scratches but that's just a theory . I know this is not an error coin and probably very unimportant to most CCF members and I apologize if I have used the forum in an inappropriate manner thanks for all the replies this was a fun one for me to figure out !
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
PSD. Note the highest points are the coin affected. It wasn't done too harshly as some of the copper remains. But the highest points on the forehead is altered by moving the zinc around. It is not a Dryer Coin was the tumbling affect would have rolled over the rims/edge of the coin. This has not happened. Just PSD probably with a sander or moving it over a cement floor only affecting the highest points.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1000 Posts |
Dryer Coins exhibit an even pitting on the faces of the coin and a thickened rim, which is the opposite of what you have here. Like you said, not an error, but still a fun thread. Coin forensics.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
900 Posts |
I've learned several new thing with this thread and have enjoyed the debate and as druu put it coin forensics ! Thanks for all the replies and info it's been fun !
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,469 |
|