| Author |
Replies: 40 / Views: 4,975 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
If you look at the pop reports, the DP4 in mint state isn't as hard as the DP5, 9/6, or TP1. There are at least two DP4 examples in 64red, a few in mint state brown. Mine is 63Brown.
CV - did you try crossing your TP1 at PCGS? If it crosses, it will be tied for highest in a PCGS holder.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
3234 Posts |
Quote: Very nice congrats C V that's the first DP#4 I've seen with no die cracks on the reverse and a very high grade It's also the first that I've seen in such an early state. CV..What a great example to share with us here..!! Would love to view others here with just a hint of d/c's starting..Any takers..?
|
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
Hello CV:
Regarding your list of toughest DP 9's to collect ... any thoughts on the availability of TP #2 (i.e., pg 293 of Charlton 2011)?
I don't see that as often as TP #1.
Edited by ChiTownRay 02/11/2017 7:50 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
Ray - I think the TP2 is somewhat more common than the TP1, though it is hard to quantify. There are mint state examples out there, which I think is more than you can say about the TP1. It is also somewhat less visibly impressive in that it takes more than Fine to see the re-punches. Still, a difficult coin. - Rob
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1442 Posts |
bosox...for TP9 I have a lovely ICG AU58 details polished, NGC AU55, ICG AU50 details (cleaned), PCGS EF45 and about a dozen in EF40 or less. the NGC AU55 didn't cross at PCGS, but it's there again for another try for their Feb.2017 crossover special...if it doesn't cross, my best PCGS TP9-1 will remain an EF45 for the TP9-2...my experience is that I have about 15 TP9-1s and 0 TP9-2s. It has eluded me. I did pass on 1 or 2 examples a few years back because it wasn't a TP9-1, but I've simply not seen them out there...I think the large cent guys picked the market clean for that one  For the DP9-4, I have seen a mis-attributed PCGS MS64 and others, then there are all those examples with the collapsed 9...so a true DP9-4 in early die state is, in my experience far scarcer than it would seem and is scarcer in my experience, than the TP9-1. Again as an example, I have 6 TP9-1 in EF40+ and only 3 DP9-4 in EF40+. Other interesting observations include: DP9-5: I have a bunch in AU and two in MS now. I'm trying to cross both MS60 coins to PCGS (both are CCCS, one is scratched). These have trickled onto the market at a steady pace and are now a bit more common than once thought.. DP9-3: I have many in AU but none in MS. Saw a ICCS MS64 on ebay and I think it fetched $10 or $12,000. DP9-2: not as common as people think. I have 4 in MS but very undervalued price-wise in MS. DP9-1: plentiful in AU, very elusive in MS...seems like no one wants to pay anything above 30% trends in AU but MS is very difficult to find... 9/6: haven't seen any high grade examples EF+ in ages...I got lucky and now have PCGS EF40, EF45 and AU50 that I won a few years back at about $500 a piece but nothing to cherrypick in high grade in years... the PCGS AU58 sold on heritage for $11,000 and I think an NGC MS62 sold recently for $6000...I didn't go for either, and my best remains a PCGS AU50. I sent everything decent to PCGS again for their crossover special, so I'll see just how many of those elusive DP9s will find themselves in PCGS holders... 
Edited by canadian-varieties 02/12/2017 02:41 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
The problem with the TP2 is that the 9 just doesn't show the re-punches below VF. Consequently, they are generally ID-ed in higher grades. I know of one 62 and one 63.
Good luck on the TP1. As much as I like having the highest PCGS coin, the universe needs more, or it becomes an unattainable variety and people loose interest.
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
Edited by bosox 02/12/2017 02:52 am
|
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
Thanks very much for that info CV,
I'm surprised that is has eluded you altogether, given the completeness of your DP 9 collections, however, not at all surprised that it is found in lower frequency than TP 1. I have found only one TP 2 out there, in mint state at an auction, and although I hate spending that kind of money, I felt I needed to take a chance on the opportunity to own at least one piece, so I paid up for it. Now I'm feeling OK about it.
thanks also for weighing in Rob, I totally agree TP 2 has less collector appeal than TP1, due to poor visibility in lower grades. It is a more subtle repunch for sure. Yet how many found examples exist, relative to TP 1 in total? The Charlton 2001 "Multiplier" used for those two seems off, where TP 1 was awarded a value equivalent to the two "holy grail" Vicky varieties, 1881 SSN and 1882 C2/C1 HPD. Should the relative N9 TP scarcities be ranked opposite one another?
I'm just stirring the pot a little with this last notion, based only on my lower "self-sampling" numbers and what I'm reading here this AM. The Charlton 2001 Variety group presumably showed numbers to support the existing ranking, while other collectors just can't find them out there.
Maybe if we shine a light on TP #2 as much as 1881 SSN, we'll have a better idea of current found #s, and the same goes for DP 9/6 as well as 1882 C2/C1 HPD. If those polls already exist in previous postings, I admit that I only dug back to last November since re-joining.
Cheers, Ray
Edited by ChiTownRay 02/12/2017 09:21 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5589 Posts |
We did not include the TP#2 in the 2011 study because it was not evident then.... Brad G was the person who recommended the '59 varieties to list ... we all took sections of all the Vicky dates where one person was responsible for doing the heavy lifting for that date(s). There were SO MANY overpunches to deal with and we tried to take the most spectacular examples ... we were not trying to show everything that was available. I probably passed over, I don't know how many, TP#2's because I thought that they were just minor "vanilla" varieties. I also don't think the the 1882 2/1 heavy repunch is rare. It's somewhat scarce, but not in the same ballpark as the other 2 mentioned.
|
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
Good to know. I was interpreting p293 as TP #2, and just assumed it was sampled comparably.
That must have been a mother of a project to complete.
Part of the fun is still having holes in the collection with something left to find.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5589 Posts |
I was in error on my last post above. I looked at my notes, rather than 71 year old memory and p 293 IS the type 2. Sorry.
|
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
OK, thanks for the clarification Okie,
and sorry to all if my tangent got too far away from the original intent of this thread.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1353 Posts |
Here is the MS-63RB example of a TP2. It is the coin that was photographed for the 2011 Charlton. 
http://www.victoriancent.com2011 & 2025 Fred Bowman Award Winner, 2020 J. Douglas Ferguson Award Winner, & 2022 Paul Fiocca Award Winner. Life Member of RCNA.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1980 Posts |
it would have been nice if Charlton used more high definition photos for their books.,,beautiful coin Rob!!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1442 Posts |
the 2011 Charlton variety section was phenomenal work given the constraints... having worked on a Large cent Variety book on and off for 4 years now, I've come to appreciate just how important and excellent the 2011 Charlton large cent section is... that's a beautiful TP9-2 bosox 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1923 Posts |
Yes very nice coin bosox like mentioned very hard coin to find in high grade I have 3 but my best is VF it shows the inner upper 9 still but the one I have in Fine doesn't show anymore to much wear.
|
| |
Replies: 40 / Views: 4,975 |