This type is not in my new upcoming World Contemporary Circulating Counterfeit chapter (i.e., ~ 100 specimens illustrated and XRF assayed) from 1500-1850 but my 2Cents this LOOKS EARLIER? than a modern Chinese forgery. Note the old lamination mark above the 3? in 1735 and just the overall irregular toning. But I could be wrong. When you encounter these IN PERSON as I indicate in my Chapter on how to easily detect Chinese Forgeries check the EDGE. You can't fake a 250 year old edge or even a 100 year old edge. It looks NEW if made recently. No marks from circulation. Of course there is weight and most Chinese forgeries are of a German silver (Cu/Zn/Ni) or Fe/Ni composition after 100 assays of these types. Occasionally but infrequently even debased silver but Chinese forgers are SO CHEAP and RUTHLESS we rarely see silver entering the composition. However - there appears to be raised cast air bubbles - look between the lettering on the reverse. Without coin in hand and this irregular toning it could be either? I can't rule out modern Chinese Forgery which was toned to appear aged. A dangerous coin.
John Lorenzo
Numismatist
United States
John Lorenzo
Numismatist
United States






















