Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1965 1-Cent - Off-Metal Error Or Possible Pattern Piece?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 5,402Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9865 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2017  11:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
... from the time it left Mint Master Parkers office in 1965 ...

How do you know it was in the Mint Master's office?
Is there some documentation?
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
Pillar of the Community
Wade's Avatar
Canada
2781 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  12:00 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Wade to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
identical size planchet, specific gravity of 75/25 Cu-Ni is almost the same as bronze


is it possible this is just a bad alloy mix?

Edited by Wade
02/18/2017 12:01 am
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
9865 Posts
 Posted 02/18/2017  12:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add DBM to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Cu-Ni test tokens of other denominations were struck in 1965 for use as samples for potential customers.
The possibility of a one cent example in that alloy isn't such a stretch for 1965.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning...
-from PCGS website
Pillar of the Community
darryldarryl's Avatar
Canada
2426 Posts
 Posted 02/19/2017  11:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add darryldarryl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I am inclined to think that this was some sort of official test rather than a back door job.


Valued Member
Zimmy's Avatar
United States
460 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2017  10:16 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Zimmy to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Per Mike Diamond's quote, "when a planchet can't be linked to a known domestic or foreign issue it is considered an "orphan" ". There are many ways a planchet can be an orphan including being struck on a token, a wrong stock foreign coin, etc. I have a few US coins that are struck on planchets of unknown origin.
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10459 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2017  3:25 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
How do you know it was in the Mint Master's office?
Is there some documentation?


Other than a few comments made by a few coin dealers, which cannot be proven to be valid or false, there is no documentation - hence why I am showing it here.

I have a few more people to ask, including some friends at the Bank of Canada Currency Museum... but I doubt I will ever find answers...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10459 Posts
 Posted 02/20/2017  3:28 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Cu-Ni test tokens of other denominations were struck in 1965 for use as samples for potential customers.
The possibility of a one cent example in that alloy isn't such a stretch for 1965.


I would like to think so... but you think there would have been some documentation of that...

It could be a trial to test the new dies with the newer version of the effigy as well...?
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
  Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 5,402Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums