Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

D/S OMM In 1990 Lincoln Cent?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,232Next Topic  
New Member
littlecoin's Avatar
United States
33 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  02:01 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add littlecoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I've read conflicting information of when the mint marks became part of the die...I hear it was 1990. Then I read doubleddie.com says, as I understood, that they started in 1990 but continued to some degree until 1994, when ALL dies included the mint mark making it impossible to get RPMs without doubling of other parts of the obverse or OMMs.

I'll provide the link to the doubleddied.com page in my reply post if it's ok with the forum.

IN any case...I found this 1990 Lincoln cent/penny that has what seems to be an S under a D.
Appreciate all opinions and teaching :)
Here are the images.


D/S-OMM-In-1990-Lincoln-Cent?

D/S-OMM-In-1990-Lincoln-Cent?

D/S-OMM-In-1990-Lincoln-Cent?

D/S-OMM-In-1990-Lincoln-Cent?
Moderator
Learn More...
Fuzzy317's Avatar
United States
14463 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  02:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Fuzzy317 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
An S mint mark should be about the same size as the D, so I don't think what you have traced is an S mint mark. Can you get your images clearer?
New Member
littlecoin's Avatar
United States
33 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  02:11 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add littlecoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you, Fuzzy317. I'm going to try to get a better pic. Wish me luck. I need an USB microscope I guess!
New Member
littlecoin's Avatar
United States
33 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  02:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add littlecoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
how about this pic?

D/S-OMM-In-1990-Lincoln-Cent?
Pillar of the Community
cwb's Avatar
United States
3463 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  02:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add cwb to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
to the forum!

It is a 1990-D damaged cent. It appears the damage is from Zinc rot.

It is impossible to have an RPM or an OMM (Over Mint Mark) on a US cent after 1989.

The same is true for the US Nickel.
Other coins stopped using the hand punched mint marks in 1990 I believe.
Edited by cwb
03/04/2017 02:47 am
New Member
littlecoin's Avatar
United States
33 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  02:51 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add littlecoin to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Oh well I tried ...I'll go back to my pile of coins..and maybe throw away everything from 1990 and later. Even the 2017 Lincoln cents have spots



ty so much for the input you all!
sending these rotten babies to a bubble gum machine (if I can find a penny one!)

Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
spru's Avatar
United States
12477 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  03:12 am  Show Profile   Check spru's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add spru to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, from what I understand, 1990 was the cutoff. Anything before had separately punched MMs and coins from 1990 onward have the MM as an original part of the die.

Split plating on Zincolns is most prevalent around the MM and date so it could be caused by the zinc core corroding or, there is a possibility of a die chip in that area.

Edit: Viewing it again, I think it may be a die chip in the D. I don't see anything in the potential zinc-rot area near it on the coin. I do see the grayish areas from split plating but, essentially no bubbles.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
Edited by spru
03/04/2017 03:20 am
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 03/04/2017  11:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The 1990 coins had the mint marks added to the design since then. So no more over mint marks or RPMs. The eyes often take over and we think we see something that is not there. I agree with the assumption that this is a split plating issue and the zinc raised after the coin was struck. It may have even happened during circulation.
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,232Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums