Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Why Are These 3 Denver Mint Marks Considered The Same Design?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,224Next Topic  
Valued Member
3193zd's Avatar
United States
292 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2017  09:47 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add 3193zd to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
So these are 1964 quarters and there was only one style of mint mark used for this year. Can someone explain how these 3 mint marks are from the same punch? There is hardly any wear on these coins. so damage to the mark I don't think comes into play. The left sides have different curves to the back and the size of the openings are all different. The serifs at the back of the D all seem different. The tallest center cutout design seems to have a straight back no curve. I was told the outside shape is the same so they are from the same design. Just trying to understand how one punch with different pressure can make these different looks.

Why-Are-These-3-Denver-Mint-Marks-Considered-The-Same-Design?

Why-Are-These-3-Denver-Mint-Marks-Considered-The-Same-Design?

Why-Are-These-3-Denver-Mint-Marks-Considered-The-Same-Design?
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2017  10:30 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I doubt if only one punch was made. One style of MM in different stages of wear is my thought.
John1
Valued Member
3193zd's Avatar
United States
292 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2017  10:56 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 3193zd to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm sorry, one design style not one punch, created all these? I assume I have the newer one on top to the older one? Now does this wear come from punching the mint mark on the die, or from wear stamping the actual coin?
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2017  12:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Both. One style of MM is not uncommon.
John1
Pillar of the Community
Halo1st's Avatar
United States
2775 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2017  1:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Halo1st to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
with John1. Though I came up short referencing 1964D mint mark Styles.

Might take into account the depth of a hand punched mint mark on the dies can very in appearance as well. Deeper equals thicker and or bolder. Lighter equals thinner and or lessor. Thanks, Doug.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2017  4:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree. The depth does have an affect on the mint marks. This being hand one, it is not precise. All the same design/style. Just different depth and angles punched.
Valued Member
3193zd's Avatar
United States
292 Posts
 Posted 04/13/2017  6:04 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 3193zd to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Guys.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,224Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums