So these are 1964 quarters and there was only one style of mint mark used for this year. Can someone explain how these 3 mint marks are from the same punch? There is hardly any wear on these coins. so damage to the mark I don't think comes into play. The left sides have different curves to the back and the size of the openings are all different. The serifs at the back of the D all seem different. The tallest center cutout design seems to have a straight back no curve. I was told the outside shape is the same so they are from the same design. Just trying to understand how one punch with different pressure can make these different looks.
I'm sorry, one design style not one punch, created all these? I assume I have the newer one on top to the older one? Now does this wear come from punching the mint mark on the die, or from wear stamping the actual coin?
with John1. Though I came up short referencing 1964D mint mark Styles.
Might take into account the depth of a hand punched mint mark on the dies can very in appearance as well. Deeper equals thicker and or bolder. Lighter equals thinner and or lessor. Thanks, Doug.
I agree. The depth does have an affect on the mint marks. This being hand one, it is not precise. All the same design/style. Just different depth and angles punched.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use