| Author |
 Replies: 12 / Views: 2,304 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
800 Posts |
This is the first note like this that I came across in circulation. That would make the parent about 53 years old and the child 20 years old. Any premium?  |
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Because of condition I would say spend. If you search 1960-1997 for anniversary on google,you may find something.I found a note awhile back that when I searched it it was the anniversary of some famous person,I forget who. I still kept it though. John1  |
|
Valued Member
United States
406 Posts |
I have one with 1890-1937. But like John said, in that condition I would spend it.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree a spender. Love your thread heading.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
564 Posts |
Spender but interesting note though
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12819 Posts |
Even if your note were CU, that would be a stretch in my book. Interesting idea though.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
372 Posts |
Interesting Note, I like it. goldnugget
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
887 Posts |
If you find 19651996, call me. Mine and my son's birthyears.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
52 Posts |
That's kind of cool. Great conversation piece.
|
|
New Member
United States
29 Posts |
Wow! Nice! But like the others say, in that condition, I'd spend it too. Plus, it's a 2009 series and is not worth much.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
800 Posts |
Quote:
... it's a 2009 series and is not worth much   |
|
Valued Member
United States
160 Posts |
Ahhh if it was 19601992 I would have wanted it! Me and my moms birth-years
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
800 Posts |
I don't know where my head was at ... the parent would be about 57 years old. The child would be about 20 years old. That's 37 years apart. My bad!
Edited by cashhound
07/31/2017 10:25 am
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 2,304 |
|
Posted 07/06/2017 08:19 am
