Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin Auctions








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1733 Mexico 8 Reales Mo-Mf Information Wanted

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 58 / Views: 14,939Next Topic
Page: of 4
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 10/12/2017  4:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
FWIW, he said 44mm, not 45.

I think there may be something to the idea of a bit of variety in the size of the dies. As the OP actually noticed... there is spacing variation - note between the denticles and legend... then legend to assayer on various 1733 specimens. That could also combine, of course, with extra denticle making it on the flan. Again, look at that first Sedwick piece I linked - lots of denticle present. In fact, at RAQ of VTRAQUE, it went just past the end of the denticles.

Also, what's the point of getting the weight right (when that could easily be explained away by loss to seawear anyway) by making the planchet suspiciously large?

And again, it's hanging out with what looks to be an overall honest, original grouping of Hollandia which, presumably, was sitting a while. How probable is it that they did that good a job back then?

Feel like emailing Dan S. and asking what diameter variation he's observed on 1733 pillars?
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 10/12/2017  4:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Before you run off (and this was seriously just to start a collection and not to resell?!!)...

If you acquaintance would let you, can you take a decent photo of the entire group laid out together - fronts and then backs if possible? It would be interesting to see the totality of the grouping...

And you're saying photos and film... so was this guy indeed involved with the salvage efforts?

Were you to buy the grouping... you should absolutely ask for at least copies (if he wants to keep the originals) and whatever pictures, film (!), and whatever other mementos he may have. That type of ephemera is important in and of itself, and certainly matched along with the actual coins. Does he have any artifacts?

Any film footage might be particularly interesting.
Edited by realeswatcher
10/12/2017 4:49 pm
Pillar of the Community
jgenn's Avatar
United States
1156 Posts
 Posted 10/12/2017  8:27 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jgenn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Gilboy has a table of measurements on page 67 that show the usual diameter as 38.0 to 39.0, min 37.0 and max 42.0 for pre-1770 8 reales minted in Mexico City.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 10/13/2017  4:26 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
"usual 38.0 to 39.0, min 37.0 and max 42.0"

But are we talking absolute largest & smallest individual pieces ever seen... or min/max "average" for a given year/part-year? In other words, that might mean the minimum "typical" size may be, say... 1766 strikes (which off-hand I know are quite compact, often little/no dents. showing)... while maybe known large-flan year 1735 is the largest ON AVERAGE?

All I know is that the aside from the diameter, what we see of the faces looks OK, the material it's with seems to be a legit grouping that such a piece could/should be with... and those several 1733 pieces from Sedwick clearly look quite large (though HOW large?).

I don't know... it would certainly be an anomaly, but this was a period of transition at Mexico's mint. E.g.... four different types (counting where they obviously used Klippe dies but on an undoubtedly COB planchet)... and in addition there are several examples of the Klippe dies stamping a ROUND planchet.
Pillar of the Community
jgenn's Avatar
United States
1156 Posts
 Posted 10/13/2017  6:24 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jgenn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
realeswatcher, how the cob and milled coinage were produced is a topic of great interest to me. I would love to discuss this so I will do some more research and start a new thread where I think I can provide a reasoned answer about whether a 44mm diameter 1733 is plausible.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2017  01:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Yeah, 44mm WOULD seem to be rather outlandish... AND if it was to be 44, there probably SHOULD be some combo of more open spacing plus fuller/longer denticles... unless all of the interior design is made from larger punches, which isn't likely (two different size crowns aside).

Also, looking again at that pic of the 1733 between the two 1736 pieces... not the greatest pic quality, but it does look kind of cast-like. And of course, if a fake was to be snuck into a group like this, the key date would be the suspect.

Has me looking at that klippe again. Though again, slightly grainy pics... does seem to have perhaps too many raised micro-dots.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 10/14/2017  04:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The more I look at the 1733 pillar, the worse it is.

The area where the (small) crown meets the globes is just a total blob on this piece...while crown and globes should be close together on this "small crown" type, that area should be well-defined.

Additionally that right globe looks misshapen (lower portion)... the digits seem too tall compared to any legit pieces (pillars-side legend lettering overall a bit "thick")... and of course the diameter.

Yeah, that's not genuine, is it... Sloppy observation by me on this one.
Valued Member
United States
97 Posts
 Posted 10/15/2017  6:47 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add afewmorecents to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You have had the opinion of an "expert" here using an image. Just a suggestion. Note what he posted about the 1733 coins and the number of fakes. I'd advise you have the seller send both 1733 coins to be authenticated. But what do I know, I'm not the expert. :)
New Member
9 Posts
 Posted 02/11/2018  10:35 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence83 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Just to complete the story the 1733 coins have been validated as genuine both where XRF tested. The round coin was not 44mm I was wrong, it was measured at 40mm. Thanks for the help and input regards Spencer
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 02/11/2018  11:46 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
"both were XRF tested"

Keep in mind, even if fake, a piece like this would be done in correct silver alloy... Unless the XRF is a sophisticated desktop unit and shows detailed trace element composition - and those traces are in fact correct for Mexican pieces of that time frame - simply popping at low 90s silver percentage doesn't prove much.

Indeed, did see that the 1733 pillar and the klippe were recently auctioned, though by a generic auctioneer and not a numismatic house such as Spink,s, DNW, London Coins.
Pillar of the Community
United States
1962 Posts
 Posted 02/11/2018  11:54 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add realeswatcher to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
By the way... how did the "believed to have come from the Rooswijk" part come about?
Pillar of the Community
jgenn's Avatar
United States
1156 Posts
 Posted 02/11/2018  3:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jgenn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for the update.


Quote:
The round coin was not 44mm I was wrong, it was measured at 40mm.


That removes my main suspicion.

I hope the original owner got more than £200.
New Member
9 Posts
 Posted 02/13/2018  5:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Spence83 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
You guys are good, sure you are not detectives. I did not know they where sold! have you got a link the auction catalogue. Rooswijk? Regards Spencer
Pillar of the Community
jfransch's Avatar
United States
1801 Posts
 Posted 02/13/2018  6:12 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add jfransch to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I somehow missed this thread when it started. The coins look like Hollandia coins though I would never say that with certainty from looking at a picture online. However I have not seen very much material from that wreck that did not have certs. Did this seller work the salvage, as was asked earlier? If so I would have expected him to have certs.
As for size, I have 11 1733 pillars, the smallest coming in at 39.72 and the largest at 40.92. Most of them are between 40.35 nd 40.43. When the discussion was talking about a 44mm pillar I was shaking my head, but like jgenn that subsided with the correct 40mm measurement. I would be interested to see what the pillar sold for at auction, does someone have that info? The MoMF is the one 1733 variety that has a significant number of non salvage examples out there, I would be surprised if that coin brought a high value in that corroded condition.
Pillar of the Community
coinworldtv's Avatar
Austria
566 Posts
 Posted 02/13/2018  7:08 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coinworldtv to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am sorry to be another party pooper here, but the 1737 milled 8 reales and the four cobs right to it look a bit wrong to me.

The 1733 pieces are nicely cloaked in corrosion, which does not guarantee authenticity.

It seems to me, that somebody is offering original salvaged ducatons mixed with dubious rare date 8 reales coins.



Edited by coinworldtv
02/13/2018 7:40 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 58 / Views: 14,939Next Topic
Page: of 4

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.33 seconds to rattle this change. Forums