| Author |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,494 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4867 Posts |
Is it normal to be disinterested in your own country's coinage? I love the classic coins but I just can't get into the newer stuff the US Mint is putting out and what they are doing these days with edge lettering and the continuation of multiple yearly quarter designs AKA ATB.
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
You like what you like soooo John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Australia
21786 Posts |
I had a very nice Shillings and Pence collection of Australian coins, which included all of the rare dates in each type, (except the 1930 Penny), together with a 17 coin gold type set which included an Adelaide Pound. The collection had to be sold to raise money for a house purchase. I was never seriously interested in Australian coins again.
My current collection of Australian coins does not include anything of serious value or rarity.
Have been into ancients and World coins since, with a moderately serious collection of American coins. Much more to learn than with just homeland numismatics, and so much more enjoyable.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5239 Posts |
@TheForce, I think that for some people, it is a case of familiarity breeds contempt. They are so familiar with their own coinage, they would prefer some novelty.
In my case, I have no special attachment to my own coinage, but I do collect it since it is readily available and not hard to get a decent type set.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188130 Posts |
Quote: Is it normal to be disinterested in your own country's coinage? I read the topic title and immediately knew which member created it.  Is it normal? I do not know, but it is certainly expected given the diversity of the world population.  Quote: I think that for some people, it is a case of familiarity breeds contempt. They are so familiar with their own coinage, they would prefer some novelty. This may be true. However, some might say the US went too far with the multi-year quarter and dollar programs. Others might prefer they use constant designs with a complete refresh every 25 years or so as was done in the past.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4867 Posts |
I wish the 25 year refresh was still the rule. I have to respect the US nickels and dimes for being so constant, although somewhat boring. Right now and for the past several years the mint and proofs sets are just too large and overpriced. I just don't see the value for paying for bloated sets that have several coins I'm not interested. If I want something I end up having to buy a single, usually at a premium. Quote: I read the topic title and immediately knew which member created it. That obvious huh? haha
|
|
Moderator
 United States
188130 Posts |
Quote: If I want something I end up having to buy a single, usually at a premium. True. You could buy the sets and sell off the excess, but time is money and that premium can be worth it to avoid dealing with what does not interest you. Quote: That obvious huh? haha Just a wee bit. 
|
|
CCF Advertiser
United States
1533 Posts |
If you are from Australia or Canada, France, or England, it is unusual. If you are from the US, not so much.
Edited by Andrew99 10/31/2017 10:35 am
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
20753 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Taiwan
192 Posts |
I think that depends to the country, some countries have many kinds of interesting coinage (e.g. Australia, particularly circulating commems), some are plain boring (e.g. Malaysia). Some have decent design but almost never change (e.g.South Korea). Indonesian coinage (if excluding Dutch East Indies) is very boring. Everyday, 99% of the coins you handle is just cheapo aluminum coins  . After they circulate for a while they become really ugly  P.S. be thankful that your coinage has no aluminum coins 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3789 Posts |
No you are ok.
The way I look at is, hey, I know what a quarter is, I see them all the time, or dimes, pennies, etc.
I prefer collecting coins from other countries I dont see too often.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6130 Posts |
I'm beginning to feel like "went too far" is a good way to sum up just about all currency across the whole world since the late 90s. Commemoratives now commemorate insignificant events or odd anniversaries of the significant ones. I'll admit that I'm still trying to complete the ATB Quarters, but digging back trough my circulation stash the other day made me realize that I have probably $400+ saved in quarters, halves, and dollars, even after a few massive purges. I'm scared to see what will happen in a few years when the ATB series wraps up and they do the whole thing over again  ^ Says the curmudgeon who collects coins of Probus, the Roman emperor who released 900+ circulation designs in 6 years. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7840 Posts |
I would not think that it would be out of the ordinary, especially since you see your home countries coinage on a daily basis. Modern U.S. coinage is so bland...bring back the classics! I would almost guarantee it would strike up some interest!
|
|
CCF Advertiser
United States
1533 Posts |
When you have no idea about what the event is that is being commemorated on your country's coins, they have gone too far. Boystown? Seriously?
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
I must agree almost 100% Force, I came to a point early this year where finances dictate what Ares of collecting I could persue effectively. Meaning, what can I complete or at least do justice to the series. World coins, except the very old, had to go. I enjoyed thoroughly collecting and learning about all the over 120 countries I had. Great learning to be had, but no way would I have been able to complete any one country in set/denoms example or otherwise. They had to go, same with foreign currencies although still have them, just dontbpersue actively. Same happened to a lot of contemporary US coinage. My quarters start with clads stop after the territories of 2009 of which I "cheated" (won at face value a nice custom whitman folder w/ BUs  ), tossing what few ATBs into that current bank dump along w two partial Presidential dollars and few SACs. Been glad ever since! Now I can concentrate on completing sets according to what I can afford, and ultimately enjoy. I don't think a Disney princess is a collectable item, even as whimsy, too bad they even have to fake 'em so much, quit making the real, no need to fake it twice anyway! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: I wish the 25 year refresh was still the rule That 1890 law is still in effect, but the law specifies that the designs MAY be changed after 25 years. It does not say that they MUST be changed every 25 years. The reason we got the 1916 changes and the 1938 nickel change was because they misinterpreted the law and assumed they MUST change the designs. Internal mint correspondence contains references stating that the 25 year limit was coming up and that they had to changed the designs. They had intended to change the dime and half in 42 but the war caused them to delay it rather than make the change while everything else was going on.
Edited by Conder101 10/31/2017 3:13 pm
|
| |
Replies: 25 / Views: 3,494 |