| Author |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,146 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
245 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
I will say MS-62, the Reverse is pretty but that Obverse looks awful baggy to me
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
 I didn't even see Bryans response and was thinking the same thing,MS62.If it had just a few less contact marks on the obverse I would go higher.Beautiful CC. 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
245 Posts |
Thanks Bryan and TLS!
The first pics I took in March, overhead fluorescent lights (energy saving incandescent replacement), and afternoon sun coming in the window, handheld. The weight one I took this morning, under my trial and error incandescent light setup. Obviously I need to figure out that white balance stuff and get a tripod!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
226 Posts |
I like just about any coin with the CC mint mark on it!  . There are some bag marks , but this is very common among morgans. Appears to have lots of original mint luster, overall a very nice coin and a piece of history. MS63 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1703 Posts |
John, Another thing to think about when shooting coin pics is most of the plastic holders or airtites we put our coins in have small scratches and marks that can make the coin look like it has more hits than it actually does.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
I think its a MS63. I see lots of graded MS63 that have a lot of contact marks on the cheeks.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Australia
1360 Posts |
My first thought was MS63, based upon the eagle's breast feathers on the reverse, and her hair above her ear and the fact that it is nicely struck. However, the more I looked at the obverse, the more I became aware of the bag marks, particularly upon her cheek, and I'm afraid that they do detract from the overall appearance. So I'd have to agree with the others - MS62.
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,146 |
|