| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,183 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
237 Posts |
Looks to me like a lamination error.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2602 Posts |
I wonder if it is possible for a coin like this to have the appearance of a lamination error, but in fact it was just hit in a certain way with a screwdriver or some other object that damaged the coin. I'm intersted in hearing other thoughts on this one, too.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Hit with a screwdriver or a foreign object? I guess anything is possible.
It doesn't look like it to me, but that's definitely into the something else category.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
527 Posts |
It looks to me like it was struck through foreign matter. A previous planchet had a lamination problem which left part of the planchet on the die, when this coin was struck that piece was embedded onto it. That's my take on it, let's see what the experts have to say.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
It's a lamination error.
Thanks, Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2734 Posts |
Agreed. A lamination error.
Error coin writer and researcher.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
236 Posts |
Not an expert but it looks like a lamination error to me too.
John Booth
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
527 Posts |
Would this cause a weight variance in the coin?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
I have a scale on order! -finally decided to buy one
I'll let you know what this weights as opposed to a regular 48 wheat back once its in.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
NGiles: No weight increase 3.11 G. just got my new scale today!- nice new toy. Image: 1948LaminationCent.jpg40.88 KB
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Like Bill and the others said, it's a typical lamination.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,183 |
|