| Author |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,169 |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11888 Posts |
Edited by numismatic student 03/30/2018 8:36 pm
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-58. I like your photography very much as a rule, but some of the cent pics you've been posting lately are pretty grim. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11888 Posts |
Yeah, it's challenging with sellers' photos but this cent was posted on the fly using my phone. Sorry for the eye strain, but these days it seems like it's a part of the hobby. 
Edited by numismatic student 03/30/2018 5:04 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
7234 Posts |
Nice condition and price for a common date IHC - Think there were over 108 million minted.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Common date , a few issues and dark . EF-45 ,yes you paid too much . 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
Looks AU. Hard to see detail on ribbon and curl.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
AU-58, I'll bet it looks decent in hand.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18665 Posts |
photos stink so i'll conservatively go AU55, although its probably closer to 58
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
11888 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
I'll stick with AU-58, very nice!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1590 Posts |
I think that this is one of those coins that because it is a common date/mm, it would grade AU 55/58. If it were an `1908-S though, with the same coloring/wear it would come in as an MS61. In my opinion.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'm still at AU-58 as well.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6385 Posts |
AU-58, also. Looks much nicer in new photos, seems like you got a solid type coin at a fair price.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,169 |
|