| Author |
Replies: 5,294 / Views: 285,809 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
Why French on these pieces, yes, that is a bit puzzling. Copper deniers and double deniers were minted until the mid 17th century, sticking to French. When liards (3 deniers) began being minted in copper 1654, they too had inscription in French - up until then they were minted in billon, with Latin inscriptions. All other denominations used Latin until the revolution, and even the liards reverted to Latin in the early 18th century. Some think the reason was that these minute denominations were intended for use by the common people, little versed in Latin. But, the majority of them were likely not versed in written French either... Perhaps the decision was influenced by the contemporary movement away from Latin to the people's language in many countries (as advocated by Protestantism) - but why then only the smallest denominations? I see no consistency in this. It all remains a mystery to me. 
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34461 Posts |
Here is another 2 Kreuzer from the German Countship of Pfalz-Simmern, but this one is from AD 1577:  
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9395 Posts |
1577 -- Kingdom of Hungary, 1 denar:  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7973 Posts |
@erafjel, it will be interesting to hear other opinions, but I understand and agree your points on official language changing from Latin to vernacular. Maybe the silver denominations are used in some international trade, and this is the reason Latin is still used (lingua franca)? As for coinage in copper, it is also an intersting topic for the 16th century. I do not collect coins of royal France, but I think Brabant (as SPanish Netherlands) is a little earlier, with some denominations in copper c. 1540. Poland, on the other hand, does not use copper consistently until about 1650. Quite a broad range... Would be interesting to hear from collectors of other regions like Spain (who I think is also an early adopter of copper), England, Germanic states ...
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34461 Posts |
Quote: Spain (who I think is also an early adopter of copper) Yes!
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7973 Posts |
From 1571 to 1576, no coins are struck at Polish mints except some denars and schillings in 1573 at Gdansk. There are interregnums 1572-73 and 1574-76. However, since Henry Valois, the future king Henry III of France is on the Polish throne 1573-74, and he uses the title King of Poland thereafter (though he had effectively abdicated), some Poland collectors have a spot in their collection for his French coins of 1575-76. France, 1576 1/2 Franc, Paris mint:  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
2895 Posts |
@erafjel Quote:I have a single coin from the 1570s, and that one I cannot nail to a specific year, so it has to stay out of this thread. If you still want to see it, you can find it here: http://goccf.com/t/306552&whichpage=33#3053675 If I have such coin, with no date, I post them in the year the ruler started his reign for that place. But I wait until a coin with that date is posted. I think Jbuck finds that ok. 
Edited by Petrus 09/09/2019 06:16 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
Quote:Quote:
I have a single coin from the 1570s, and that one I cannot nail to a specific year, so it has to stay out of this thread. If I have such coin, with no date, I post them in the year the ruler started his reign for that place. I thought it had to be attributable to a specific year (according to some calendar)? From the rules for the thread (my emphasis): Quote: 4. The date needs to be validated as described below: Common era dating is preferred, but it is acceptable if the date can be converted from another calendar. It is also acceptable if the date can be determined to the exact year from other criteria.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Sweden
2124 Posts |
@tdziemia Quote: As for coinage in copper, it is also an intersting topic for the 16th century. ... Would be interesting to hear from collectors of other regions like Spain (who I think is also an early adopter of copper), England, Germanic states ... The first Swedish copper coins are from 1624 and were for smaller denominations. Later that century manufacture of copper coins for larger denominations began, resulting in "coins" weighing up to 20 kg! The concept of fiat had not been introduced in Sweden at that time, so the metal value had to correspond to the nominal value. In reality, these metal plates were more a way to certify copper for export than intended for daily (and very impractical) use. Sweden exported large amounts of copper, not least to France for their copper coinage  .
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Belgium
1185 Posts |
the big copper plates for export are really interesting below two types of early leeuwendaalders : type 1b, Dordrecht mint, knight oriented to the left Delmonte 830 a scarce type   type 2, Dordrecht mint, knight oriented to the right Delmonte 831 a much more common type   these coins are 100% revolutionary as the King and his titles are omitted instead an anonymous knight, who evolved from a clown-like mocking figure to a symbol of strength is present on the obverse - the legend MO NO ARG ORDIN HOL explains that this silver coin was made by the province of Holland the reverse has the rampant lion which has given the coin its name and international fame as a prototype of an early trade dollar. the legend CONFIDENS DNO NON MOVETUR (he who trusts on God does not falter) relates to the toleration of Calvinism. But 1575 and 1576, with the risk of death penalty for illegal coin production, these coins were made with another purpose: with a 10% higher denomination than silver content; Philipsdaalders and Bourgondische kruisdaalders from the Habsburg system were melted and converted to these new coins. The profit, estimated to be at least one million florins, was used to pay the war effort of the revolt. we will tomorrow see a type 1a leeuwendaalder, the first coin of the autonomous revolting province of Holland, which was made during the last month of 1575 this is a piece that is very hard to find and of course it contains the elements of my cryptic ccf name 
Edited by 1c5d7n5m 09/09/2019 1:29 pm
|
|
Moderator
  United States
190660 Posts |
Looking good! 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7973 Posts |
Quote: The first Swedish copper coins are from 1624 Likewise, in the Poland Lithuania commonwealth, there was first a small emission of copper schillings even later in 1650, then large scale production of small copper schillings 1659-1666 (we had some of these posted here for those years). After that, a hiatus of over 80 years, until copper coins returned permanently in multiple denominations starting 1753.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34461 Posts |
Quote: this is a piece that is very hard to find and of course it contains the elements of my cryptic ccf name I had no idea! Here is a uniface 2 Pfennig from the Austrian State of Salzburg dated AD 1576:  
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9395 Posts |
1576 -- Duchy of Courland, 1 schilling:  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
7973 Posts |
Quote: Quote: this is a piece that is very hard to find and of course it contains the elements of my cryptic ccf name.
I had no idea! Nor did I! Really enjoyed the interesting/different daalders from 1c5d and his great curating, as well as contributions from places we haven't seen in a while (Salzburg, Courland). Also a belated shout out for @giljan's thaler of yesterday. Gorgeous coin. Quote: Looking good! Oh yeahhh ... 16th c. is rockin' 
Edited by tdziemia 09/09/2019 8:47 pm
|
| |
Replies: 5,294 / Views: 285,809 |