| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 963 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4113 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Looks like a well worn RPM to me! John1
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Looks like die movement. Is there evidence in other areas of this distortion. The Machine Doubling can distort that area or ejection doubling can affect some areas of the devices.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Hi Coop!
Where and what am I supposed to look for evidence of die movement on this coin besides the mint-mark area we are discussing?
Thanks,
Chuck.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi,
It's just a damaged D. In the overall scheme of things it is critical to know what the mint mark is supposed to look like when it is undamaged.
On this D, it was either hit, or the die scraped it. metal was moved across the surface of the D from left to right and then circulation wear made it a little more smooth.
Thanks, Bill
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Hi Bill:
Question- if this was damaged, and then moved, how does that explain what appears to be 3 D's from a head on and side angle picture? Is this a ripple effect?
Do you have a picture of a normal 1954D mint-mark that I can compare actual size to?
Thanks,
Chuck.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
You don't get three D's on a coin this worn. I'll look for a 54 D and see if I can get a pic posted. Don't go away:-) This will take a few minutes....
Oh...if it was an RPM that was that far into the D on the left...you would see a large bulge to the right of the D, probably with a nice area of separation.
I'll be back....
Edited by foundinrolls 07/27/2008 5:00 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
I did some diggin' and I can't lay my hands on a '54 D without doing major excavating:-) When I find one, I'll post it here. In any case, the first coin in the thread is still not an RPM:-)
Thanks, Bill
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
Chuck: It doesn't look like any other Machine Doubling on the reverse. Part of the reason I mentioned the die movement/ejection doubling was the metal push on the West side of the mint mark. On BU coins (Cents is my specialty) you can see lines. Not die flow lines, but lines from a rough edge sliding over the metal. I've seen that on a few Lincolns and noticed it appear that way also. I have a Kennedy half that also displays the same marking/pushing on mint mark. Like Bill mentioned, even a bent punch can distort the mint mark. Other coins from the same year may show the same thing if this is the case. Good thought Bill.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4113 Posts |
Thanks for all the responses.
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 963 |
|