Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1978 LMC Experimental

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 5,467Next Topic
Page: of 2
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  07:49 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Would like some input please, I found a 1978 LMC while roll searching that is clad in color i.e. looks like the color of a dime.
My first thought was that it was mercury treated but it weights 3.1 grams.Questions; does such a coin exist?, would it weight 3.11 grams?
if it's genuine what's it worth?.
I know, you want pics, sorry, no camera + no money for a camera = no pics .
Thanks, John1
Rest in Peace
pyrbob's Avatar
United States
1943 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  07:53 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pyrbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is the correct weight for a 1978 LMC. It is probably plated.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  08:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
pyrbob,thanks for responding so fast,i know that 3.11 grams is the proper weight for a copper LMC, but what would the weight be for the experimental bronze-clad steele planchet if one even exists?
John1
Rest in Peace
pyrbob's Avatar
United States
1943 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  08:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add pyrbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I am not aware of a bronze clad steel planchet from the late 70's so I don't know what the weight would be. My guess looking at the weight of steel compared to zinc is the steel plachet would be .4g heavier.
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  08:38 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The experimental coins were in 1973 - copper coated steel. I don't know what their weight would be, but there are two things....they were all destroyed, and they would be magnetic. If you happened to have one (chances are billions and billions to one) it would be magnetic.

The most likely scenario is that you likely have a coin that by chance started out very slightly underweight, and a very thin micro-layer of nickel was applied to coat the coin. The weight difference would be very minimal.

Second most likely would be that your coin was struck on a foreign planchet, but the fact that the weight is so close to a normal copper cent really negates this chance significantly.

Bottom line is that there were no 'experimental' cent planchets in 1978, and you are almost certainly (cahnces 99.99%) holding a plated coin.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  4:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Also, experimental cents in 1974 made of aluminum were minted. Of the more than 1.5 million pieces made, all were destroyed with the exception of one piece that resides in the National Collection at the Smithsonian.

In any case, there were no experiments that I am aware of that took place in 1978 with respect to cent composition.

Thanks,
Bill
Edited by foundinrolls
07/31/2008 4:06 pm
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  5:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The aluminum cents were made in 1974, but I take some issue with Bill on this one.

All accounts I have read on this subject clain between 200,000 and 250,000 pieces struck. Some 200 pieces were handed out, and all were recovered - save about a half dozen. The Smithsonian piece is not included in this half dozen, so all of those (except of course for the Smithsonian piece) are unaccounted for to this day, and all (except for the Smithsonian piece) are illegally owned, according to the feds.

A couple of interesting tidbits regarding this non-issue...

1. I have read in more than one reliable place that all the cents in this experiment were minted at West Point. Furthermore, West Point was a back-up to the Philly mint for years before beginning their reign as the bullion mint. A large number of Philly mint cents from 1974 through 1986 were actually minted at West Point.

2. There are two different obverse designs used for the 1974 cent. It is widely believed that this design change was created because of the metal change to aluminum. The one Smithsonian piece is a large date example. A number of collectors who actually pay attention to the design difference in 1974 cents believe that the large date was the first design used for the year, but it is my belief that the small dates were actually first because the only known aluminum cent is a large date, and the aluminum cents are reported to have been made in May. If the design was 'changed' to better serve aluminum planchets, and the only aluminum cent known is a large date, then the change had to have been from small date to large date.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  10:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi All,

This is all the info pertaining to 1974 experimental cents that had been disputed in these posts. This indicates the dates and mintages of the experimental pieces. It's a little long but worth the read from the educational standpoint:-)

Based upon a transcript of a Congressional hearing, occurring on July 19, 2006

before the HOUSE FINANCIAL SERVICES
SUBCOMMITTEE ON DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY POLICY,
TRADE, AND TECHNOLOGY
HEARING July 19, 2006, entitled:
Coin and Currency Issues Facing Congress: Can We Still Afford Money




In Testimony given by Beth Deisher, editor, CoinWorld

seen at:
http://209.85.141.104/search?q=cach...k&cd=6&gl=us



I found the following.

Both the bronze-clad steel cents and the aluminum cents struck experimentally were both dated 1974.

None were dated 1973 although, some were struck in 1973.

In the transcript is the following: From beth Deisher's testimony:

"Permit me to explain why such an inventory is important. Back in 1994, when an
experimental 1974 Lincoln Cent struck on a bronze-clad steel planchet surfaced, Coin
World contacted U.S. Mint officials, in part to help verify whether the item could be
genuine. Bear in mind, a 1973 Treasury publication stated that such a coin was never
produced, yet our source claimed that it was produced and that a quarter million or more
of them were destroyed by Mint officials more than 20 years earlier, but that a few pieces
escaped destruction. It took Mint officials more than two months to state that the
previously unknown experimental pieces had indeed been produced. With that revelation
also came the news that the U.S. Mint had retained two of the experimental 1974 Lincoln
cents struck on bronze-clad steel planchets in its specimen files. (See Exhibits D 1 and D
2). This was historical information and historic artifacts that well could have been lost to
numismatic history had not an example surfaced in the collector arena."




Further in the testimony,

"The story behind the Mint's striking of the 1974 Lincoln aluminum cent is well documented. In the early 1970s,
copper prices steadily rose on the international market. By the summer of 1973, the value of the copper content
in the cent and the coin's manufacturing costs nearly exceeded the denomination's face value. As a result, the
Mint began looking for alternative metals.

After testing seven different alloys of aluminum and other compositions, including bronze-clad steel, Mint
officials in December 1973 requested Congress approve legislation that would give the secretary of the Treasury
authority to adopt an aluminum alloy for the cent.

The proposed legislation was referred to the House Banking and Currency Committee and the Senate Banking,
Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. Meanwhile, the Mint had already begun striking the 1974-dated
aluminum coins, using regular production Lincoln Cent dies.

Mint records indicate that 1,571,167 of the aluminum cents were struck over the course of two production runs.
In order to show congressional leaders what the coins would look and feel like, 14 of the trial pieces were given
to the committee members and their staff members - nine to House committee members and staff, and five to
Senate committee members and staff. Other pieces were also distributed to Mint and Treasury officials.
With the fall of copper prices in 1974 and opposition from members of the vending machine industry, who
contended the aluminum cents would not work in vending machines, the proposal never got out of committee.
Mint officials, lacking any authority to change the cent's composition, decided to melt the million and a half
pieces that had been struck.

In preparation for the destruction of the coins, Mint officials asked congressional members and staff to return the
pieces that had been distributed. Some of the distributed pieces were returned to the Mint, but not all. Several
pieces were claimed as lost. One staff member gave the piece in his possession to the National Numismatic
Collection at the Museum of American History at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., where it remains."

Long post, but the mint records indicate that both experimental pieces were dated 1974 and that 1,571,167 aluminum alloy cents were struck. Futher toward the beggining of the record and qouted by me was a statement in the record of "a quarter million or more" of the bronze-clad steel cents dated 1974 were destroyed.


12 to 14 of the aluminum pieces are thought to be extant, two are known, One is in the Smithsonian and one is an example that surfaced and was graded by ICG and PCGS. It is known as the "Toven Specimen" . Officer Albert Toven's family has refused to comment on the coin since his death, so I don't know what the current status of the coin is. This coin was found by officer Toven in the basement of the Rayburn building, he had said that when he reported the find to a congressional representative he was told to keep the coin...so he did.

Thanks,
Bill

Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  10:31 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This was a duplicate of the previous post and I couldn't delete it for some reason...Sorry about that..Chief:-)
Thanks,
Bill

Edited by foundinrolls
07/31/2008 10:36 pm
Pillar of the Community
XavierOfGreen's Avatar
United States
2589 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  10:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add XavierOfGreen to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I read in an article once that at least one or two of the bronze clad steel specimens also still exist, some magazine's editor(i think it was Coin World) supposedly had one shown to him by a worker at the foundry that destroyed them. I also have read that in addition to the philly specimens, a few specimens were struck in denver. Also a few aluminum specimens were apparently struck in 1975. I'm pretty sure the 1975 and d mint mark coins were destroyed though, since only a handful of each were made.
I found some information about this here.
http://www.coinfacts.com/small_cent...974_cent.htm
http://www.coinfacts.com/small_cent...74d_cent.htm
http://www.coinfacts.com/small_cent...975_cent.htm
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 07/31/2008  11:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Hi,
A reference to that is up in my post. The testimony is by Beth Deisher, editor of CW. She references the piece that was examined by CoinWorld.

Thanks for the additional info,

Bill



Thanks,
Bill
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 08/01/2008  12:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very nice, and very interesting. Much of this I had never heard to date. From all accounts that were reputable accounts, no more than 250,000 had been struck. Now that number chnages in my mind...BUT...it states 1.5 million were struck, 250,000 were destroyed. So where are the remainder?

I knew about the 1973 copper/steel cents but was unclear as to the method of manufacturing the planchets...so it was clad, not plated. Another interesting tidbit I hadn't known. That would make them VERY close to the size, weight, and composition of the 2 Pfennig coin from West Germany from 1950 through the end of their manufacture. I found one of these once in Germany with a metal detector. The two brass sides of the coin were still there, but the steel sandwiched in the middle was completely rusted away. I would expect the same result of US cents made of a steel clad or alloy. This appears to be what our cents are moving toward, which will end up making nice BU specimens something to hold on to. Reason being, a LOT of cents end up on the ground and in other environmentally exposed places - if they are made of steel, they'll rust to nothing inside a decade. Within 30 years we will see the effect of this (horrible, in my opinion) decision...older cents (those made of steel and more than ten years old) will be virtually non-existant.

So this leads us to a different topic...have there ever been coins minted of steel regularly in any foreign country? If so, what is the survival rate of these coins? Do they rust like 1943 cents? Do they last, and if so, what has been done to make them last? Has the US Mint paid attention to this and acted upon it?

Valued Member
seattleMD's Avatar
United States
405 Posts
 Posted 08/01/2008  1:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add seattleMD to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Canada mints their cents in copper plated steel. They started that in '98 I believe.
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 08/01/2008  1:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Howdy,

1,571,167 million aluminum cents. All destroyed but for 12-14 (estimate). 2 are known. One, the Toven piece the other in the Smithsonian collection.

250,000 or thereabouts on the copper/steel cents. A few (a miniscule) unknown number) escaped destruction and there are two that were kept by the Mint. They are in the Mint's "specimen file" as it is called.

Maybe that was confusing due to the length of the post but the info is in the post.

Thanks,
Bill

Edited by foundinrolls
08/01/2008 1:46 pm
Pillar of the Community
foundinrolls's Avatar
United States
3507 Posts
 Posted 08/01/2008  1:57 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add foundinrolls to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The Czech Republic Mints coins out of galvanized steel. Their 1,2 and 5 Crown (Koruna) are produced of this material. Their 10 crown coin is steel covered in copper. Their 20 crown coin is steel covered in copper -nickel.

A general name given to iron-carbon alloys having smaller amounts of carbon than cast iron. Strictly speaking most modern iron coins are made of steel. Steel rusts very readily so it needs a coating when used for coins.

Nickel and copper clad steel coins were in use in Bolivia from 1965 to 1987, when hyper-inflation led to a new series of stainless steel coins.

Zinc coated steel was used for 2 Franc coins during the Allied Occupation of Belgium in 1944. They were made from the same blanks as the zinc coated steel US 1 cent piece of 1943.

The 'bronze' coinage of the UK has been copper-clad steel since 1992, with a couple of minor exceptions.

In 1997 Canada introduced a copper-plated zinc cent.

In 1999, Canada began to experiment and issue what they call a multi-ply plated steel cent.

Some were delivered to vending companies and ultimately found their way into circulation.

The Canadian cent coins are still struck in both compositions although a major move toward the multi-ply steel cents has taken place over the past few years. About 1% in 2007 were copper-plated zinc while 99% were multi-ply steel.

These are other ones I can pop off real quick, there are probably others.



Have Fun,
Bill

Edited by foundinrolls
08/01/2008 2:09 pm
Pillar of the Community
coppercoins's Avatar
United States
7629 Posts
 Posted 08/01/2008  2:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coppercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
And so my question after a very detailed comprehensive list like that - how many of these steel coins exhibit the same problems as the 1943 cents? Do the Canadian steel cents last? Do any of the more recently minted steel world coins rust and corrode easily? I know very little about metals, but what I do know about steel is that it rusts. Are they planning to do anything at the US Mint to keep the coins they are talking about minting from rusting into dirt?
  Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 5,467Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.45 seconds to rattle this change. Forums